Re: Watermarking the password/key
- From: Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 01:28:12 +0100
John E. Hadstate wrote:
"Skybuck" <skybuck2000@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1157324260.924699.288050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThey may simply have to go from 128 bit key variables to 256Hello,
I present to you which might be a new concept/idea/method for detecting
traitors:
"Watermarking the password" or
"Watermarking the key"
Won't this procedure reduce the size of the key space by the number of bits required for the watermark?
bit key variables.
Andrew Swallow
.
- References:
- Re: Watermarking the password/key
- From: John E. Hadstate
- Re: Watermarking the password/key
- Prev by Date: Re: Watermarking the password/key
- Next by Date: Re: test
- Previous by thread: Re: Watermarking the password/key
- Next by thread: Re: Watermarking the password/key
- Index(es):