Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- From: kim@xxxxxxxxxxx (Kim G. S. Øyhus)
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ed7q13$qrj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mike Amling <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
Mike Amling wrote:
However, its possible to partition an N-dimensional space so that no
point is close to more than N+1 regions.
Ah... that's a good thing to know, and I did not. One
dimension is obvious; in two dimensions, hexagons work and
so do courses of bricks; in three, shifted courses of bricks
look good. Maybe shifted-courses work indefinitely? Is there
a proffered general construction?
Er... The N-dimensional offset parallelopipeds (bricks) work fine in
Euclidean space R**N, but I'm not sure what I claimed is still true if
one or more dimensions are discrete, rather than continuous.
No, they do not.
Kim0
.
- References:
- Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- From: Mike Amling
- Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- Prev by Date: Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- Next by Date: Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- Previous by thread: Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- Next by thread: Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|