Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- From: "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Aug 2006 17:29:52 -0700
David Wagner wrote:
Huh. That does seem like a good question. I haven't the foggiest;
I can't see how hash(m,Y) could be any worse than hash(m) xor hash(Y),
either. Perhaps it's worth emailing the authors of ECDSA?
To avoid confusion, he's not talking about X9.63 EC-DSA. They're
talking about the Korean DSA algo [K == Korean right?].
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/P1363a/contributions/kcdsa1363.pdf
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- From: xmath
- Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- References:
- Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- From: xmath
- Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- From: David Wagner
- Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- Prev by Date: Re: Short string of data as input of SHA 256
- Next by Date: Re: About RSA key generating
- Previous by thread: Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- Next by thread: Re: Curve25519-based EC-KCDSA
- Index(es):