Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jul 2006 22:39:44 -0700
"Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I'd say it's fair to suggest that the NSA knew about DC, that IBM
didn't,
Why would it be fair to suggest such a thing, when there's zero
verifiable evidence for it, and published accounts (e.g. Levy's) to
the contrary? See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
for Wikipedia policy about verifiability.
I think the Don Coppersmith talk that Roger referred to was "The
Development of DES" from Crypto 2000. Maybe there is a transcript
somewhere. If someone here is in contact with Don Coppersmith (he is
no longer at IBM), maybe they could ask him.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- References:
- Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: Roger Schlafly
- Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- From: Tom St Denis
- Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- Prev by Date: Oh this is good...
- Next by Date: store salt in database
- Previous by thread: Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- Next by thread: Re: Wikipedia "Cryptography" reaches Featured Article status
- Index(es):