Re: ECC point compression trick
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:50:39 GMT
"Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Why not always just use the positive root [adjusting your secret
multiplier as required since (-k)P == k(-P)].
In a finite field I'm not sure how you want to specify which root
is "positive".
You still have to compute the root to find y but now you don't even
send the one bit. You just send x.
You can already do that. See:
http://cr.yp.to/patents/us/6141420.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ECC point compression trick
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: ECC point compression trick
- References:
- ECC point compression trick
- From: Tom St Denis
- ECC point compression trick
- Prev by Date: Re: [LTC] ECC <= 112
- Next by Date: Re: http://leopard.uk.com
- Previous by thread: Re: ECC point compression trick
- Next by thread: Re: ECC point compression trick
- Index(es):