Re: [LTC] ECC <= 112
- From: "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 08:10:13 -0700
Nils Durner wrote:
-int ecc_sign_hash(const unsigned char *in, unsigned long inlen,
- unsigned char *out, unsigned long *outlen,
+int _ecc_sign_hash(const unsigned char *in, unsigned long inlen,
+ void **r, void **s,
prng_state *prng, int wprng, ecc_key *key)
Sorry for the second reply ...
I should also point out leading function names with an underscore is
not a portable convention [iirc]. It's generally supported on most
platforms but is a bad idea for general linking.
:-)
I'd call this
ecc_sign_raw()
Tom
.
- References:
- [Patch] [LTC] ECC <= 112
- From: Nils Durner
- [Patch] [LTC] ECC <= 112
- Prev by Date: Re: [LTC] ECC <= 112
- Next by Date: Re: ECC point compression trick
- Previous by thread: Re: [LTC] ECC <= 112
- Index(es):