Re: Could anyone verify a term for me?
- From: Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:18:54 GMT
William L. Bahn wrote:
f = (b & c) | ((~b) & d) // notice inclusive-OR[...]
However, you do have an error
in that it should be inclusive or and not exclusive or. A bit
surprisingly, however, both yield the same results for the
initial values used - I wonder if that is coincidental or it if
I suspect you'll be even more surprised if you try to find
values for b, c and d such that
(b & c) | ((~b) & d)
(b & c) ^ ((~b) & d)
yield different results.