Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- From: "bert" <bert.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Jun 2006 02:01:55 -0700
georgezhim@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
hi all,
In a given RSA system with public (n,e), how do I prove that there
exist more than
one possible secret exponent d that works ?
In other words, how can I show that there exists d' < phi(n), d' !=
e^(-1) mod(phi(n))
which correctly decrypts every message C =m^e modn ?
thanks alot!!
George
I don't know enough real mathematics to understand
Kristian Gjosteen's replies in this thread either, but...
If n = p*q, phi(n) = (p-1)*(q-1) as I'm sure you already
know, but take lambda(n) = phi(n)/hcf(p-1, q-1), and
d = e^(-1) mod(lambda(n)). Then there at least two
exponents, d and d + lambda(n), which correctly
decrypt every message. In fact there are precisely
hcf(p-1, q-1) such exponents less than phi(n), only
one of which is e^(-1) mod(phi(n)).
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- From: georgezhim
- Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- References:
- RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- From: georgezhim
- RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenSSL Hacks
- Next by Date: Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- Previous by thread: Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- Next by thread: Re: RSA: more than one secret exponent d exists ???
- Index(es):