Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: "David A. Scott" <daVvid_a_scott@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:36:25 +0000 (UTC)
David Eather <eather@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:447f0fe5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Because there is a bigger and more important agender that needs to go
on. People who feel safe and valuable in a community make good
citizens. People who are worried about the future and know there is
no support for them if they are unlucky, make poor citizens who only
look out for themselves.
If ones to lazy to look out for there self why should others. Secondly
if someone is going to treat everyone equal. Why should I work hard to
get ahead. Sure the liberals will win. As more people get on welfare and
have the good life when doing nothing. What incentive is there to work.
I know so called poor people who throw food away for fear if they don't
use there free food allowance to the fullest it might get cut. Government
should aid in research and defense but when a civilazion caters to the
lazy who get the free goodies taken from the productive ones. There is
point where it will collapse. Since they will vote for those promising
the most goodies.
That is part of the reason France will fall in 20 years at most. If
we both live long enough I hope to post a "I told you so". Fair doesn't
mean equal until women can write there name in the snow as easily as the
average man.
Good citizens make safe, strong, productive countries that are good
world citizens - that's why it's important to treat people fairly,
evenly and with compassion.
Please treat all people fairly with compassion but don't take my money
to spend it on them use yours. Curious where do you stand on the BIll of
Rights. Should the average citizen be trusted with a gun? I think so its
called the great equalizer but somehow I think you may not really want
equality.
Ah, so you advocate a form of socially and economically pressured
eugenics targeted at individuals who had no control over their genetic
inheritance. Shall I march in you 1933 parade, or perhaps your utopia
is more like GATAC?
Actually it was GATACA and your twisting what I say a very good liberal
method of attack. And like you spelling of GATACA you haven't a clue to
what I am advocating which is no surprise. Life is not fair.
look at people with color blindness would it be fair to them to
force the rest of us to wear special glasses so we only see in
black and white. I had a friend who went to Viet Nam he sees only in black
and white and very good nite vision. He was the kind of guy you would
want in warfare standing next to you he sees what you can't and visa
versa. We all are different and all have different abilites. That
doesn't mean that I should do what you think is necessary for fair
social justice.
There are thousands of genetic "defects" you can be screened for.
Your "solution" to one of them does not weaken my point.
Well then we don't agree so what.
Most people don't choose illness. You have no control over what you
inherit or have triggered or inflicted by there environment.
Yes life is a crap shoot and in the end we all die get use to it.
We should strive for is trying to make do with what you have.
We will never have everything we want or need. That doesn't
mean you have to destroy someones wealth just because you
see a better way to spend it. A company should be free to sell
health insurance to those it wants. The government should enforce
the contracts companies make. But its not governments concern who
the company sells insurance to. If forced to sell to all then
the average man could never afford it. I guess you would say tax
the rich and give the insurance to all. That my friend is the
fastest way to destroy democray and would kill the future of
mankind and quickly lead to a nonproductive society.
If you can find me (in context) making a raciest remark post it, or
apologies for your defamation.
Ok I apologize. I mistakenly took the tone of your post here:
"That's a very dangerous (and very, very ugly) path to tread. You end up
saying that some people are worth more than others."
as implying I was racist. I am not and I suspect neither
of is. But look at it this way. I have 0 racism and if you have ten times
as much you would still have 0. The fact is I don't think either one
of us is. But then again I do see statistical differences in races.
I don't think pigmy races would make as good basket ball players as
Zulu. But then I don't belive thats racist. I think if I stay in the
sun as long as a dark person I will get skin cancer first is that
racist. No I don't think so. In fact I don't like putting race on
forms. I doubt if most americans really know what subgroup there
genes come from we are very mixed. We tend to associate color with
race but thats not necessarily true.
When I was 17 I asked a friend why another guy kept calling him
"Jungle Bunny" He gave me an odd look and said, "because I'm black,
you idiot". Until that day I had never even thought that anyone would
treat someone different because of the color of there skin.
I could give some cute stories to but whats the point. Neither of
us needs to prove that to each other. I again apologize for saying
your more racist than me. In fact maybe I am more god knows I am
not pefect but in my heart I truely belive I have zero. If you
belive in your heart you have zero. Then obviosly I was wrong
saying you most have more than me. In fact lets say its both zero.
David A. Scott
--
My Crypto code
http://bijective.dogma.net/crypto/scott19u.zip
http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version
My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/
**TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" **
Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged.
As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic
system is only as strong as its weakest link"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: David Eather
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- References:
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: David Eather
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: David A. Scott
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- From: David Eather
- Re: QC-proof cipher?
- Prev by Date: Re: I AM A BANANA!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Help spread strong cryptography now!
- Previous by thread: Re: QC-proof cipher?
- Next by thread: Re: QC-proof cipher?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|