Re: Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- From: "xmath" <xmath.news@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 11:17:07 -0700
scsistemas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The last two bytes are (I think) the checksum. I've tried with a number
of different algorithms, including a number of CRC-16 variations, but
nothing.
Anyone has a clue?
Looks like a non-standard CRC-16 indeed. I quickly hacked together
something that produces the right values for the examples you gave:
http://cds.xs4all.nl:8081/tmp/crc16weird.c
- xmath
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- From: crc
- Close, but no tomato
- From: Belanovo
- Re: Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- References:
- Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- From: scsistemas
- Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- Prev by Date: Re: Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- Next by Date: AES Questions From Another Dummy.
- Previous by thread: Re: Checksum Algorithm Reverse Engineering
- Next by thread: Close, but no tomato
- Index(es):