Re: NSA and crypto



tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
Actually compression does improve security, when the plaintext
has a substantial amount of redundancy (as most do). There is
This is flawed reasoning. If the plaintext has no entropy ... it isn't
a secret. ...

You totally didn't understand what I was saying.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?
    ... The ciphertext can be as long as the entropy in the key ... >>plus the entropy in the plaintext, before it has any redundancy. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Encrypting random plaintests
    ... what the redundancy Rof the plaintext, the entropy Hof the ... encrypting a plaintext with R- for example, ... bits - every ciphertext block will be the same. ... transformation ensures indistinguishability ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: OTP4U (new cipher proposal)
    ... > So I think that the level of entropy should remain the same in every ... block as the amount of plaintext in that block; ... but rather to foil ciphertext-only cryptanalysis by ... design symmetric systems with key size great enough ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Encrypting random plaintests
    ... Goal is random plaintext strings. ... what the redundancy Rof the plaintext, the entropy Hof the ... bits - every ciphertext block will be the same. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Bijective - an explanation please?
    ... As long as the total redundancy - according to the attacker's model of the ... expected plaintext - is less than the entropy of the key, ... > case" of some less ideal compression routine. ... information theoretical security can not be achieved ...
    (sci.crypt)