Re: JSH: Hyperbolic factoring method

Tim Peters wrote:
[added "JSH:" to subject]

[jstevh@xxxxxxx]
It turns out I DID fix the problem with my latest surrogate factoring
equations:

You said that before on sci.crypt, April 10. Was there a reason people
should have doubted you then?

T = (x+(k_3 -1)y - vz)(x + y + vz)

x^2 + k_3 xy + k_1 y^2 = k_2 z^2

(2(v^2 - k_2)z - (k_3 - 2)vy)^2 = (((k_3 - 2)^2 - 4(k_1 - k_3 + 1))y^2
- 4T)v^2 + 4k_2(k_1 - k_3 + 1)y^2 + 4Tk_2

where my earlier equations were the equivalent of k_3 = 1, which won't
work. Also, k_3=2, won't work, but other values should be fine, like
k_3 = 3.

I really wonder sometimes if you people are suicidal.

I am deliberately posting after my post on the sum of primes being
related to quadratic residues--which relates to Goldbach's
conjecture--as I want it to be absolutely clear if you people continue
to push this that you are doing so with your eyes wide open.

Make no mistake. If math society wants to put itself in the position
of answering to a lot of investors, in a world that is changed forever
because you people sat on your hands and wished I'd go away, then don't
be surprised if people all over the world fall all over themselves
trying to figure out ways to punish you.

I don't want you to go away. In this case, I want you to get off your ***
and discover for yourself whether this pile of equations leads to a useful
method for finding integer factors.


I never posted the equations that don't have errors in them.

You didn't know? Silly human. How many times do I have to say that I
don't want to solve the factoring problem?

As for whether or not the correct equations work, I no longer care.

But I'm not correcting the corrections here.


James Harris

.