Re: DaVinci Crap!



Mxsmanic wrote:
NASA just needs to hang around rec.photo.digital more. Lots of people
there claim that you can blow up a digital photo to any size using
special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes
(presumably pulling it from hyperspace).

"Lots of people"? I've seen a number of discussions on enlargement
on rec.photo.digital, including some really excellent material and
some pretty clueless stuff. I didn't see anyone claim software
actually pulled in more detail. Do you have a citation for that,
or you just misrepresenting people's positions?


--
--Bryan
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DaVinci Crap!
    ... special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes ... Lots of people believe that computers actually *think* to solve the ... Saying that you can blow up a digital photo to *any size* by using ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: DaVinci Crap!
    ... special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes ... Lots of people believe that computers actually *think* to solve the ... Saying that you can blow up a digital photo to *any size* by using ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: DaVinci Crap!
    ... special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes ... Lots of people believe that computers actually *think* to solve the ... Saying that you can blow up a digital photo to *any size* by using ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: DaVinci Crap!
    ... there claim that you can blow up a digital photo to any size using ... special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes ... (with the whole car occupying about 10 pixels) and ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: DaVinci Crap!
    ... special software that will put in all the necessary detail as it goes ... methods create better looking enlargements than others. ... One reason ...
    (sci.crypt)