Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- From: rpw3@xxxxxxxx (Rob Warnock)
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:45:13 -0500
Joseph Ashwood <ashwood@xxxxxxx> wrote:
+---------------
| 1) Any cipher mode becomes weaker after 2^(blockSize/2) blocks, for a
| 64-bit cipher this is 32GB, for a 128-bit cipher this is 256,000 PetaBytes
| (295,147,905,179,352,825,856 bytes).
+---------------
Typo, perhaps? 295,147,905,179,352,825,856 is 2^68.
2^(128/2) == 2^64 == 18,446,744,073,709,551,616.
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@xxxxxxxx>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- References:
- Implementing byte stream cipher
- From: hugonz
- Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Implementing byte stream cipher
- Prev by Date: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem
- Next by Date: Re: is it sufficient to solve factoring problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- Next by thread: Re: Implementing byte stream cipher
- Index(es):