Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: kim@xxxxxxxxxxx (Kim G. S. Øyhus)
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
In article <7xvet5juun.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
kim@xxxxxxxxxxx (Kim G. S. Øyhus) writes:
Anyway, I must use a cryptographic PRNG, since it must be invertible.
What are you talking about? You mean you need a block cipher? Use AES.
That is why I had to construct them myself. I had planned on never
disigning a cipher, but here I am.
Don't even think of designing your own cipher. Use AES.
I do not know of any usable ciphers having the properties I need,
hence I had to construct it myself. Sorry I cannot tell you more.
Kim0
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- References:
- Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: Kim G. S. Øyhus
- Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: Kim G. S. Øyhus
- Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- From: Paul Rubin
- Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- Prev by Date: Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- Next by Date: Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- Previous by thread: Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- Next by thread: Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|