Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:44:08 +0200
Matthew Harrison wrote:
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
2. Is it feasible ?
No, as it would allow to create a collision, violating the goal of a
cryptographic hash.
You must have misunderstood what I was asking ... I'm not asking for a
hash that creates the same result from two different images.
OK, then your problem is that a hash doesn't omit any information about
the hashed content, so you'd need to do bruteforce searching.
However  I've got stuff at this end that detects them ... (see the
email address above).
So then: why do you do such stupid modifications? It's just a harassment
for the people willing to reply.
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Matthew Harrison
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 References:
 Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Matthew Harrison
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Sebastian Gottschalk
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Matthew Harrison
 Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Prev by Date: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Next by Date: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Previous by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Next by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
