Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:44:08 +0200
Matthew Harrison wrote:
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
2. Is it feasible ?
No, as it would allow to create a collision, violating the goal of a
cryptographic hash.
You must have misunderstood what I was asking ... I'm not asking for a
hash that creates the same result from two different images.
OK, then your problem is that a hash doesn't omit any information about
the hashed content, so you'd need to do brute-force searching.
However - I've got stuff at this end that detects them ... (see the
e-mail address above).
So then: why do you do such stupid modifications? It's just a harassment
for the people willing to reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Matthew Harrison
- Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- References:
- Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Matthew Harrison
- Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Matthew Harrison
- Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Next by Date: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Next by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|