Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Matthew Harrison <m.harrisson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:57:53 +1000
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
2. Is it feasible ?
No, as it would allow to create a collision, violating the goal of a
cryptographic hash.
You must have misunderstood what I was asking ... I'm not asking for a hash that creates the same result from two different images.
I'm looking at creating a one way hash as normal (with minimal collisions), but ensuring that the resulting hash result is that of the modified image.
That is  the resulting hash will not be that of the unmodified image.
hehe... spammers have automated such replacements since years! ;D
However  I've got stuff at this end that detects them ... (see the email address above).

Pinging self [127.0.0.1] with 32 bites of banana cake:
Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
Slices: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Unruh
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Sebastian Gottschalk
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: ink
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 References:
 Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Matthew Harrison
 Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 From: Sebastian Gottschalk
 Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Prev by Date: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
 Next by Date: Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
 Previous by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Next by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
