Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- From: Matthew Harrison <m.harrisson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:57:53 +1000
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
2. Is it feasible ?
No, as it would allow to create a collision, violating the goal of a
You must have misunderstood what I was asking ... I'm not asking for a hash that creates the same result from two different images.
I'm looking at creating a one way hash as normal (with minimal collisions), but ensuring that the resulting hash result is that of the modified image.
That is - the resulting hash will not be that of the unmodified image.
hehe... spammers have automated such replacements since years! ;-D
However - I've got stuff at this end that detects them ... (see the e-mail address above).
Pinging self [127.0.0.1] with 32 bites of banana cake:
Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
Slices: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
- Prev by Date: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Next by Date: Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- Previous by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question
- Next by thread: Re: Complex Theoretical One Way Hash Question