Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- From: "Ed Weir \(ComCast\)" <Anon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:43:05 -0700
<panteltje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145308295.953337.276670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Carlos Moreno schreef:
|
|
| > Anyway, I'm hoping someone here might know a bit about the
| > technical details, how they really work and if they're really
| > secure (reasonably secure, that is -- not like I need to
| > protect my house against the top secret military agencies
| > or against the cream of the cream of the organized crime).
|
| I can say only one thing:
Well, that's about all you know, so go ahead...
| wireless cameras, and other wireless stuff is 100% idiotic NOT secure.
| That is from the POV of electronics and design.
Linear idiocy, that is. Use Ch. 3, you should be able to afford that.
| It is easy for an attacker to find the frequency these things work.
| Then it is easy to bring a transmitter to jam it.
Hhahahahahahaa ROFLMAO - ever hear of spread spectrum??
| It may then well continuously signal alarm or error, or no picture, or
| whatever, locating the interfering transmitter can be more difficult.
| That would take time.
Yeah - just look for the smoking van...
| As the place will not know WHERE it is attacked, it will have to switch
| off all those alarms, and will be without protection until a service
| guy comes.
| (One that can locate the jammer haha).
| The attacker can use that time.
| And, actually the same goes for RFID tags, jam the place with a
| transmitter,
| and no tag will be readable.
| Wiring a good alarm system is difficult and requires some knowledge.
| Lots of pitfalls possible.
|
If the sytem uses spread spectrum (which is very likely) you will have to
spend a LOT of $ to jam every channel it uses. for a SIMPLE spectrum that
could mean 256 transmitters capable of jamming all the links from a greater
radius than whatever physically exists in the security installation.
Keeping this simple as possible, that would mean a van full of 2Ghz+
transmitters each drawing about 10 watts each. You would be sitting inside
a microwave oven, and that's just scratching the very surface of all the
problems you face.
Hehehehehee ignorance is bliss, no? You'll have a LOT of time to think
about it!
Jeez...
- Ed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- References:
- Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- From: Carlos Moreno
- Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- From: panteltje
- Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- Prev by Date: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Next by Date: Re: Software protection
- Previous by thread: Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- Next by thread: Re: Cryptographic strength in Wireless Alarm Systems?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|