Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- From: panteltje@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Apr 2006 14:19:11 -0700
cryptic99@xxxxxxxxx schreef:
No, it's perfectly useful.
What would you use to generate OTP-box with 26 coins or hand full of
dices? *This* is not very practical. My device could be used
anywhere-it can be size of a small keychain. It is operated with just
one button, and you can pour epoxy inside of it-so there's no way to
temper it.It's portable and simple.I'm only looking for weak points of
this method of RNG.
I do not know of any weaknesses of hand.
But have only thought about it fior 3 minutes.
To generate some random number of a few digits seems OK to me.
But bring in the brain pattern (like keystroke behavior) of the person
using it, some statistics, and who knows.....
Analyse speech, get YOUR timing signature... mmm.
Not betting.
LOL
.
- References:
- Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- From: cryptic99
- Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- From: cryptic99
- Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Prev by Date: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Next by Date: Re: Seeking entropy article by Whatsisname
- Previous by thread: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Next by thread: Re: Electronic RNG not enough secure for OTP?
- Index(es):