Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed witha random key each time ?
- From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:03:34 GMT
Mike Amling wrote:
Phil Carmody wrote:
It makes David Scott's bijective rants look comparatively sensible.Now you've gone too far.
Actually David Scott had a good, original idea there.
He didn't present it optimally for this audience, however.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: vedaal
- Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: Mike Amling
- Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: Terry Ritter
- Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- From: Mike Amling
- attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bruce Schneier Gets It Wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Simple secret-sharing protocol with verifiability
- Previous by thread: Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed with a random key each time ?
- Next by thread: Re: attacking a re-used OTP // is it possible if it is changed witha random key each time ?
- Index(es):
