Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Mar 2006 10:41:45 -0800
TC wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Why are you hassling people about this?
It's called an "argument". I'm told they often happen on usenet.
Paul, I'm simply trying to support the OP, who asked a simple question,
& did not seem to get much help in reply. But as he has clearly dropped
dead, or been paralyzed from the head down, or taken holy vows of
silence, I have no desire to continue further on his behalf.
I agree with the others on this wrong. Self-decrypting files are not a
smart idea. At best you need a raw decrypter to compare against and in
that case you might as well just have a decrypter lying around.
I don't see why this thread went on so long. It's fairly obviously a
bad idea.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Ari Silverstein
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- References:
- Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: crypt-o-time
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Unruh
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: David Eather
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Prev by Date: Re: Standard for Feige-Fiat-Shamir
- Next by Date: Re: Encrypting numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Next by thread: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Index(es):