Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Ari Silverstein <abcarisilverstein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:33:16 -0500
On 29 Mar 2006 05:10:49 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote:
Yes, and the OP has decided that the file needs encryption, because of
a concern about attackers intercepting it and reading its contents.
Why on EARTH should anyone assume that an attacker willing to go to
the trouble of intercepting the file and reading it, won't also be
willing to tamper with it?
Because you think like a cryptologist and the vast remainder of the world
does not.
--
Drop the alphabet for email
.
- References:
- Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: crypt-o-time
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: TC
- Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- From: Paul Rubin
- Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Prev by Date: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Next by Date: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Previous by thread: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Next by thread: Re: Automate GPG or PGP to make an .exe
- Index(es):