Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- From: Felix Rawlings <fraw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:26:38 GMT
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:30:17 -0800, tomstdenis wrote:
For all those who were trying to insult me about how much GMP was
faster...
:-) ^_^ grin ^_^
This is on an Opteron 275 running the latest GMP and my newly crafted GMP
plugin for LTC (basically calls mpz_powm).
GMP:
RSA-1024 encrypt_key took 121194 cycles RSA-1024 decrypt_key took
1845297 cycles RSA-1280 encrypt_key took 169824 cycles
RSA-1280 decrypt_key took 3278677 cycles RSA-1536 encrypt_key took
229255 cycles RSA-1536 decrypt_key took 5317780 cycles
RSA-1792 encrypt_key took 301444 cycles RSA-1792 decrypt_key took
8069089 cycles RSA-2048 encrypt_key took 384635 cycles
RSA-2048 decrypt_key took 11513466 cycles
Compare to TFM:
RSA-1024 encrypt_key took 178994 cycles RSA-1024 decrypt_key took
1376474 cycles
Hmm... That's about 5.5 times slower than Itanium 2.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- From: BRG
- Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- References:
- GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- From: tomstdenis
- GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- Prev by Date: Re: A hyperbolic solution
- Next by Date: Re: A hyperbolic solution
- Previous by thread: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- Next by thread: Re: GMP versus TFM on an AMD64
- Index(es):