Re: RSA question
- From: tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 8 Mar 2006 19:04:02 -0800
Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote:
At least for quantum computers it is proven, that there will be such a
method possible. It would completely destroy the security of any
cryptosystem, that gets its security from the DLP or integer
factorization problem. But yet suitable quantum computers have to be
built to run it. See Shor's algorithm:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm>.
By the way, if that would be proven, then public key cryptography would
become _very_ boring. =)
This gets toted around quite often but lacks perspective. If, for
example, it takes you exponential time to build the sufficiently large
k-qubit computer then does it matter?
The point is we don't know how long it takes to generate an arbitrary
instance of Shors algorithm because nobody has done it. So while it
pays to be at least aware of such advances it doesn't pay to be an
alarmist about such advances.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- References:
- RSA question
- From: Tuvas
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Pubkeybreaker
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Tuvas
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: RSA question
- From: Pubkeybreaker
- Re: RSA question
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: RSA question
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- RSA question
- Prev by Date: Re: If you found a way of factoring large numbers fast...
- Next by Date: Re: Rijndael .Net Managed Class VS Rijndael Win32 C++ (MFC) Class
- Previous by thread: Re: RSA question
- Next by thread: Re: RSA question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|