Re: coded/encrypted sms
- From: tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 04:44:27 -0800
adam wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:56:44 -0800, "Ed Weir \(ComCast\)"
<Anon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Golly... Ed, the stinky smell of a troll is rising off of you like
waves of heat from a desert highway.
I agree with Ed. Random ciphertexts are not appropriate for this
group.
First off, because that's not what sci.crypt is for
Second, he didn't ascii armor the text or provide a checksum. So many
readers won't get the correct text anyways. So even if this were the
right group, which it isn't, we can't read it.
Tom
.
- References:
- coded/encrypted sms
- From: conney
- Re: coded/encrypted sms
- From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
- Re: coded/encrypted sms
- From: adam
- coded/encrypted sms
- Prev by Date: Re: Overwritten posts
- Next by Date: Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
- Previous by thread: Re: coded/encrypted sms
- Next by thread: Hash function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|