When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: "Ulf Reiman" <ulf.reiman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 07:11:34 -0800
When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function, (if it does it)
assume HMAC (Data) when Data can be from 8 to 120 byte compared with
a MAC message usingt Hash(Source address, Data) and Source address can
be from 2 to 8 byte.
Regards
Ulf Reiman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: David Wagner
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: Ulf Reiman
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: Ulf Reiman
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: David Wagner
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- Prev by Date: Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- Next by Date: Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- Previous by thread: DSA speed vs AES speed
- Next by thread: Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|