Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- From: tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 06:32:42 -0800
Pubkeybreaker wrote:
"And the question is: approximately, how much time should we expect
this
encryption to take? Much more than 10 seconds? Much less? Same order of
magnitude? "
Microseconds, at most.
They didn't strictly say a desktop processor. A microsecond on a
standard 8051 is 12 cycles whcih is the time it takes to execute a "1
instruction cycle" opcode.
IIRC an AES implementation (from the submission papers) was thousands
of cycles. I don't recall the exact figure but let's say something
like 2000 cycles just for the sake of discussion (cuz that sounds about
right, I think in reality it's probably lower but that doesn't matter).
So on a CPU where 512-bit DSA takes "10 seconds" I doubt AES is running
on an Athlon64 or Pentium4.
Tom
.
- References:
- DSA speed vs AES speed
- From: Ignacio G.T.
- Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- From: Pubkeybreaker
- DSA speed vs AES speed
- Prev by Date: Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- Next by Date: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
- Previous by thread: Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- Next by thread: Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|