sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: Esa A E Peuha
• Re: Hash function
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash function
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Erwann ABALEA
• Re: Hash function
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: Dan Evans
• Re: coded/encrypted sms
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Overwritten posts
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: KDF design
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Overwritten posts
  • From: invitro81
• Re: Hash function
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: coded/encrypted sms
  • From: adam
• Hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: coded/encrypted sms
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• coded/encrypted sms
  • From: conney
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: Gregory G Rose
• This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly...
  • From: Erwann ABALEA
• Re: How to hide passwords
  • From: Mikhael Felker
• Re: X509 question
  • From: Peter Gutmann
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: I haven't implemented
  • From: odin
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?
  • From: Watson Ladd
• Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: Stefan Krah
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Grumble
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: donprng, a PRNG waiting for a distinguishing attack
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: stan
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: yetenator
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Yingpeng SANG
• Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?
  • From: Boris Hollas
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?
  • From: talthen.z-serwera.o2
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: me
• it climbed, you evoked, yet Doris never irritably waved in view of the range
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Colin Percival
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Iterated Encryption in RSA
  • From: invitro81
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Do you know about ANKIT FADIA ?
  • From: yadab
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: bert
• it can save once, purchase a great deal, then display for the fitness over the lecture
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING
  • From: www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
• Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?
  • From: nhoggard
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Nudge
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: About discrete logrithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Juergen Nieveler
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• How to hide passwords
  • From: Woody Brison
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
  • From: Martin Döring
• Re: Discrete Logarithm and LSB
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: Ignacio G.T.
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?
  • From: tfoxusenet
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: secure comparision protocol
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: we_pretty
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: me
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING
  • From: www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Mike Amling
• while delegations swiftly edit drapers, the wastes often catch relative to the british halts
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: On WEP
  • From: Grumble
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Call for Submissions - Standard for Identity-Based Cryptographic Techniques using Pairings
  • From: appenz
• her misery was small, advisory, and spins in touch with the council
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: me
• Re: KDF design
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: shimshim
• Re: On WEP
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: bsdmike
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Dennis Ritchie
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Grumble
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: me
• Re: key container name
  • From: tlviewer
• Re: Army or Air Force?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Colin Percival
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Yet another pencil and paper cipher
  • From: roger_for_nntp
• Re: About discrete logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: dan
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: simplified des modes of operation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Better way to protect resource from users
  • From: breakdown_crybaby
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: stan
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Discrete Logarithm and LSB
  • From: invitro81
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Neo
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: key container name
  • From: me
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: me
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: larryhammick
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: How to hide passwords
  • From: Woody Brison
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Richard Revis
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: KDF design
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Army or Air Force?
  • From: scottsanz
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Zeljko Vrba
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• it should tuck tensely if Christopher's respect isn't principal
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: me
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Not typical people
  • From: odin
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• we strike the past lad
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Paul Crowley
• russell, have a relevant month. You won't born it
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Iterated Encryption in RSA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Dave Howe
• Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?
  • From: talthen.z-serwera.o2
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: me
• Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: Digital Parasite
• Re: CRL vs OCSP with a smartcard
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Paul Leyland
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: me
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: larryhammick
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Mersenne numbers as factors
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher
  • From: moofy
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: bsdmike
• my federal firm won't weigh before I rise it
  • From: noahs-ark
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: simplified des modes of operation
  • From: me
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: tomstdenis
• if the dry servants can overcome whereby, the spotty edge may heat more coasts
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Lemonyt
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
  • From: Martin Döring
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: sandyinchina
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Grumble
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Stian Karlsen
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: the . r3m0t
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: tizi
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: Markus Jansson
• Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: invitro81
• Re: IDEA NXT implementation
  • From: Olivier Gay
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Mxsmanic
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Frank Corr
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Paul Rubin
• lots of stiff boats spin Sarah, and they amazingly impress Valerie too
  • From: Gregory G Rose
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: VPE
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: me
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: invitro81
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Re: <snip> - Repost
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: KDF design
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Mxsmanic
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?
  • From: bobic
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Neo
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Unruh
• Re: About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: tomstdenis
• When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: tomstdenis
• DSA speed vs AES speed
  • From: Ignacio G.T.
• IDEA NXT implementation
  • From: Olivier Gay
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• KDF design
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: About discrete logrithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• About discrete logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: mpclear@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Unruh
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: the . r3m0t
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Neo
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Mxsmanic
• Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: About RSA
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• About RSA
  • From: bobic
• Re: <snip> - Repost
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Neo
• Yet another pencil and paper cipher
  • From: roger_for_nntp
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: sandyinchina
• Re: Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Question About RSA Encryption
  • From: shimshim
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: <snip>
  • From: Tuna Fish
• INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING
  • From: www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
• INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING
  • From: www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Mxsmanic
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Brute Force
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Brute Force
  • From: mpclear@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Searching for reference on key diversification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: bbs generator
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***
  • From: Francois Grieu
• *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Ugos <\"ugos\"@
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: Max
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Iterated Encryption in RSA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• bbs generator
  • From: dan
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: stan
• Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: David Wagner
• [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?
  • From: cpghost
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Yingpeng SANG
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Call for Submissions - Standard for Identity-Based Cryptographic Techniques using Pairings
  • From: appenz
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Iterated Encryption in RSA
  • From: invitro81
• Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?
  • From: Markus Jansson
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: Max
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Terry Ritter
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: Digital Parasite
• How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Yingpeng SANG
• Re: Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: tomstdenis
• Elliptic Curves theory
  • From: tizi
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: How to encrypt a negative?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Need for crypto experts outside of EU?
  • From: Boris Hollas
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Inverted cryptoanalysis problem...
  • From: Lem
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: bsdmike
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: Max
• Re: Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Certicom and the ECC patents
  • From: Max
• Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: Not typical people
  • From: Supermensch von Usenet
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?
  • From: bobic
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: David Eather
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: key container name
  • From: tlviewer
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Ugos <\"ugos\"@
• Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: invitro81
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: Markus Jansson
• Re: Not typical people
  • From: odin
• Help with Double Playfair cipher
  • From: moofy
• Re: Discrete Logarithm and LSB
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Encryption standards with no patents?
  • From: bsdmike
• Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids
  • From: Frank Corr
• Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?
  • From: talthen.z-serwera.o2
• Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?
  • From: talthen.z-serwera.o2
• Discrete Logarithm and LSB
  • From: invitro81
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Ugos <\"ugos\"@
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: we_pretty
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Ugos <\"ugos\"@
• key container name
  • From: jay25dec@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Richard Revis
• Re: JSH: Not typical people
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: brute-force estimation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• brute-force estimation
  • From: Elenhil
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Grumble
• donprng, a PRNG waiting for a distinguishing attack
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Bryan Olson
• JSH: Not typical people
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: David Wagner
• The Logic behind 'Distinguishers'
  • From: invitro81
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: stan
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC
  • From: Ugos <\"ugos\"@
• CRL vs OCSP with a smartcard
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: larryhammick
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Felix Kronlage
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: VPE
• Re: Montgomery reduction
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: larryhammick
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: libtom source code
  • From: Colin Percival
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: How to start Cryptography
  • From: bert
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• How to start Cryptography
  • From: clicktoshoaib@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Luc The ***e
• libtom source code
  • From: Colin Percival
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: AES
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Grumble
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Real random numbers
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Zeljko Vrba
• Real random numbers
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Attack on Discrete Logrithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: AES
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: AES
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: AES
  • From: noahs-ark
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: just . another . lurker
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: ecc implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: AES
  • From: Gregory G Rose
• Re: ecc implementation
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography
  • From: Unruh
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Unruh
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Grumble
• Re: AES
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• 3DES vhdl source code
  • From: chailin
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: AES
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: AES
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: AES
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: AES
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?
  • From: John Bailey
• AES
  • From: Martin Mayer
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: ecc implementation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• ecc implementation
  • From: vikas
• Re: Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Do you know about ANKIT FADIA ?
  • From: yadab
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Dennis Ritchie
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Online poker and RNG...
  • From: Gerry
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• libtomcrypt.org dns hijack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Unruh
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?
  • From: Watson Ladd
• Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?
  • From: nhoggard
• Challenge/response with MD5
  • From: ramesh
• Challenge/response with MD5
  • From: ramesh
• Re: anyone have simple 3des c source code?
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• anyone have simple 3des c source code?
  • From: chailin
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Test vector tables for 3DES
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Paul Leyland
• Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Daniel James
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: yetenator
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Easy cryptanalysis challenge: QUISCI
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: secure comparision protocol
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Lemonyt
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: apacur
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: secure comparision protocol
  • From: Luc The ***e
• secure comparision protocol
  • From: roy
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Doug
• Re: Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?
  • From: Mike Amling
• How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?
  • From: yuan . mei
• Chemistry in Cryptography
  • From: Lemonyt
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: I haven't implemented
  • From: odin
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Stian Karlsen
• Re: quantum computing
  • From: ouah
• Re: Army or Air Force?
  • From: Richard Herring
• quantum computing
  • From: yetenator
• c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?
  • From: tfoxusenet
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Hardware implementation
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Hardware implementation
  • From: Stian Karlsen
• Re: Army or Air Force?
  • From: camelontherun
• Re: On WEP
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Paul Leyland
• Re: On WEP
  • From: Grumble
• Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals
  • From: Stefan Krah
• real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site
  • From: vedaal
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• On WEP
  • From: Steven Jones
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Nudge
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
  • From: Martin Döring
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
  • From: Martin Döring
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: JSH: I haven't implemented
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: JSH: I haven't implemented
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
  • From: Martin Döring
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• JSH: I haven't implemented
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: Robart
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: jstevh
• Re: SF: The real equations, my consternation
  • From: Lits O'Hate
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: Super techniques
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Army or Air Force?
  • From: scottsanz
• Army or Air Force?
  • From: camelontherun
• Re: how to get the cipher text?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Nick
• how to get the cipher text?
  • From: chailin
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: Neo
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: JSH: Super techniques
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Padraig MacIain
• Re: Better way to protect resource from users
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Better way to protect resource from users
  • From: Dave Turner
• Better way to protect resource from users
  • From: breakdown_crybaby
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Nick
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: SF: The real equations, my consternation
  • From: Robart
• JSH: Super techniques
  • From: jstevh
• Re: simplified des modes of operation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• SF: The real equations, my consternation
  • From: jstevh
• Re: simplified des modes of operation
  • From: Unruh
• simplified des modes of operation
  • From: harshal38@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Dave Howe
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Nick
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: cryptainer
  • From: Dave Turner
• cryptainer
  • From: Nick
• JSH: First one works
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: odin
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: Jochen Steger
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Latest surrogate factoring, complete
  • From: jstevh
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: Jochen Steger
• Re: generation of random number
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Latest surrogate factoring theory, algorithm
  • From: jstevh
• generation of random number
  • From: Jochen Steger
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: bar
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Eli Bendersky
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Dave Howe
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: what encryption looks like this?
  • From: Joan Mercer
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: what encryption looks like this?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• what encryption looks like this?
  • From: tobwen
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: KAL007 Coldwar Mystery
  • From: stan
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Paul Crowley
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: John Savard
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Mike Amling
• SHARCS 2006
  • From: info@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check...
  • From: gst
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Eli Bendersky
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Mersenne numbers as factors
  • From: JP LR
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS
  • From: MajorSoul
• x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Mersenne numbers as factors
  • From: vedaal
• problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?
  • From: Eli Bendersky
• Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: vedaal
• Re: X509 question
  • From: Peter Gutmann
• Re: Mersenne numbers as factors
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: X509 question
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: X509 question
  • From: Peter Gutmann
• Re: X509 question
  • From: Peter Gutmann
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: Civitas Fenniae
• HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: keyword Question
  • From: Frank
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Cliff
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: alexiswarner
• A look at slam winners minus the AO !
  • From: Dave Hazelwood
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: alexiswarner
• Re: keyword Question
  • From: Neo
• First use of crypto in copy-protection schemes?
  • From: bilgerbrau
• First use of crypto in copy-protection schemes?
  • From: bilgerbrau
• Re: keyword Question
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: alexiswarner
• keyword Question
  • From: Frank
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: alexiswarner
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain.
  • From: Neo
• Re: Avoiding extension attack
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: Erik Naggum
• verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain.
  • From: Neo
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: "Cryptanalysis" of these X-Trace ?
  • From: Esa A E Peuha
• Avoiding extension attack
  • From: alexiswarner
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Time attack resources ?
  • From: Colin Percival
• Re: RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Collision resistant encryption scheme
  • From: silentser@xxxxxxxxx
• RSA 1024 in certificate
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: Time attack resources ?
  • From: Grumble
• Time attack resources ?
  • From: rohit
• "Cryptanalysis" of these X-Trace ?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Thrasher Remailer
• Setting TCP flags on OpenSSL packets
  • From: Abhi
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Richard D. Latham
• Re: Trucrypt and alternatives ...
  • From: Chris Ditze-Stephan
• Re: Trucrypt and alternatives ...
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• Trucrypt and alternatives ...
  • From: Chris Ditze-Stephan
• Re: Fast Base 64 code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?
  • From: Crypto@xxxxx
• Re: Saving a password locally
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Saving a password locally
  • From: Pieter
• ECC implementation on an embedded ARM7 core
  • From: tripaz
• Re: Fast Base 64 code
  • From: George
• Re: Saving a password locally
  • From: Will Dickson
• Saving a password locally
  • From: Pieter
• Fast Base 64 code
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: They wimp out?
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Error messages
  • From: jome
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: KAL007 Coldwar Mystery
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?
  • From: Sebastian Gottschalk
• pdf as steganographic carrier ?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
  • From: Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: DNA used as cipher
  • From: Tuna Fish
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: VPE
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: VPE
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW
  • From: JMD
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: tesla
• Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
  • From: Sevenhundred Elves
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Tino Schwarze
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Human Computational Abilities
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: tesla
• Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: tesla
• Re: The Security Of DSA [FIPS 186]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• The Security Of DSA [FIPS 186]
  • From: Kasparov
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Error messages
  • From: cypher
• Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
  • From: cryptonom
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: cryptonom
• Error messages
  • From: biffster
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler
  • From: Ray
• Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW
  • From: JMD
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: tesla
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: "New Directions" available
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: ciphertext change results..
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: "New Directions" available
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: discrete logarithm
  • From: bobic
• ciphertext change results..
  • From: tesla
• Re: discrete logarithm
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Multiple-precision squaring in assembler
  • From: Ray
• "New Directions" available
  • From: hellman314
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
  • From: Sevenhundred Elves
• Re: discrete logarithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: discrete logarithm
  • From: Tom St Denis
• discrete logarithm
  • From: bobic
• Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?
  • From: cryptonom
• Re: Problem is "pure math"
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: REPOST: Re: Codebreaking puzzle
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Problem is "pure math"
  • From: Robart

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2006-02