sci.crypt

• Date Index

---

• Overwritten posts, invitro81
  • Re: Overwritten posts, Will Dickson
• Hash function, bobic
  • Re: Hash function, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Hash function, Mike Amling
  • Re: Hash function, Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Hash function, Joseph Ashwood
• coded/encrypted sms, conney
  • Re: coded/encrypted sms, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: coded/encrypted sms, adam
      • Re: coded/encrypted sms, tomstdenis
• Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, karl malbrain
  • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, David Wagner
    • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, karl malbrain
  • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, Peter Pearson
    • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, Dan Evans
      • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, tomstdenis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, Will Dickson
    • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, David Wagner
      • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, Will Dickson
      • Re: Mass flooding of sci.crypt, Esa A E Peuha
• This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Erwann ABALEA
  • Message not available
    • Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Phil Carmody
    • Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Erwann ABALEA
      • Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: This newsgroup is becoming useless, sadly..., Unruh
• How to hide passwords, Woody Brison
  • Re: How to hide passwords, Woody Brison
  • Re: How to hide passwords, Mikhael Felker
• When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
    • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
      • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, Ulf Reiman
      • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
      • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, David Wagner
      • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, David Wagner
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, David Wagner
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, tomstdenis
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: When do HMAC use less CPU power than Hash function in a MAC, David Wagner
• DSA speed vs AES speed, Ignacio G.T.
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, tomstdenis
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, tomstdenis
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, tomstdenis
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, tomstdenis
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, Ignacio G.T.
  • Re: DSA speed vs AES speed, Gregory G Rose
• IDEA NXT implementation, Olivier Gay
  • Re: IDEA NXT implementation, Olivier Gay
• KDF design, giorgio.tani
  • Re: KDF design, giorgio.tani
  • Re: KDF design, David Wagner
  • Re: KDF design, David Wagner
    • Re: KDF design, giorgio.tani
• Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, David Wagner
  • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, David Wagner
  • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, David Wagner
    • Re: Pre-encrypt IV in CBC mode, David Wagner
• About discrete logrithm, bobic
  • Re: About discrete logrithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: About discrete logrithm, bobic
  • Re: About discrete logrithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
• Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery, Francois Grieu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery, Francois Grieu
  • Optimize the team's strategy in this lottery, Francois Grieu
• About RSA, bobic
  • Re: About RSA, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: About RSA, Francois Grieu
      • Re: About RSA, bobic
      • Re: About RSA, Francois Grieu
      • Re: About RSA, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: About RSA, bobic
      • Re: About RSA, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: About RSA, Francois Grieu
    • Re: About RSA, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: About RSA, Francois Grieu
  • Re: About RSA, Unruh
  • Re: About RSA, bobic
  • Re: About RSA, Unruh
  • Re: About RSA, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: About RSA, bobic
  • Re: About RSA, bobic
  • Re: About RSA, Joseph Ashwood
• Re: <snip> - Repost, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: Re: <snip> - Repost, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Yet another pencil and paper cipher, roger_for_nntp
  • Re: Yet another pencil and paper cipher, roger_for_nntp
• Question About RSA Encryption, shimshim
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Ertugrul Soeylemez
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Luc The ***e
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Harald Hanche-Olsen
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Luc The ***e
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Mike Amling
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Unruh
      • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Mike Amling
      • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Mike Amling
    • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Unruh
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Ertugrul Soeylemez
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Mike Amling
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, shimshim
  • Re: Question About RSA Encryption, Harald Hanche-Olsen
• INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING, www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
  • Re: INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING, www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING, www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
    • Re: <snip>, Tuna Fish
      • Re: <snip>, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: <snip>, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: <snip>, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: <snip>, Tuna Fish
    • Re: <snip>, Tuna Fish
    • Re: INSTANIOUS QUNATIUM COMPUTER OF UNIVERSAL TIME TAKE BACK TIME AND BUILD INFINTE WORLD WITH NO ONE KNOWING, www.qubit.org the quantium matrix you cannot get out of
• Brute Force, mpclear@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Brute Force, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Brute Force, Mxsmanic
    • Re: Brute Force, Neo
      • Re: Brute Force, Mxsmanic
      • Re: Brute Force, Neo
      • Re: Brute Force, the . r3m0t
      • Re: Brute Force, Unruh
      • Re: Brute Force, mpclear@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Brute Force, Neo
      • Re: Brute Force, Mxsmanic
    • Re: Brute Force, Neo
  • Re: Brute Force, sandyinchina
  • Re: Brute Force, Unruh
  • Re: Brute Force, Mxsmanic
  • Re: Brute Force, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Brute Force, the . r3m0t
  • Re: Brute Force, sandyinchina
  • Re: Brute Force, me
  • Re: Brute Force, me
• Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, David Wagner
    • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
    • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Searching for reference on key diversification, Francois Grieu
• *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***, Francois Grieu
  • Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***, Francois Grieu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***, Francois Grieu
    • Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***, Luc The ***e
    • Re: *** cancels, and how to deal with them ***, Luc The ***e
• bbs generator, dan
  • Re: bbs generator, tomstdenis
  • Re: bbs generator, Cristiano
  • Re: bbs generator, Cristiano
  • Re: bbs generator, tomstdenis
  • Re: bbs generator, Cristiano
  • Re: bbs generator, dan
• [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
  • Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, David Wagner
    • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
      • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, David Wagner
      • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
      • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, Terry Ritter
      • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, David Wagner
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
  • Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, Terry Ritter
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, cpghost
  • Re: [FAQ?] Cryptanalysis of stacked encryption algorithms?, David Wagner
• Call for Submissions - Standard for Identity-Based Cryptographic Techniques using Pairings, appenz
  • Re: Call for Submissions - Standard for Identity-Based Cryptographic Techniques using Pairings, appenz
• How to encrypt a negative?, Yingpeng SANG
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, tomstdenis
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, David Wagner
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Ertugrul Soeylemez
    • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Yingpeng SANG
      • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Unruh
      • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Ertugrul Soeylemez
      • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Unruh
    • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Ertugrul Soeylemez
    • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Yingpeng SANG
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, tomstdenis
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, David Wagner
  • Re: How to encrypt a negative?, Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Elliptic Curves theory, tizi
  • Re: Elliptic Curves theory, tomstdenis
  • Re: Elliptic Curves theory, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Iterated Encryption in RSA, invitro81
      • Re: Iterated Encryption in RSA, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Iterated Encryption in RSA, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Iterated Encryption in RSA, invitro81
  • Re: Elliptic Curves theory, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Elliptic Curves theory, tizi
  • Re: Elliptic Curves theory, tomstdenis
• Need for crypto experts outside of EU?, Boris Hollas
  • Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?, tomstdenis
  • Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?, Markus Jansson
  • Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?, tomstdenis
  • Re: Need for crypto experts outside of EU?, Boris Hollas
• Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Ertugrul Soeylemez
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
      • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., David Wagner
      • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
      • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., David Wagner
      • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., David Wagner
      • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., David Wagner
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Ertugrul Soeylemez
    • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Inverted cryptoanalysis problem..., Lem
• Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials, David Wagner
  • Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials, David Wagner
  • Re: Finite fields and reciprocals of polynomials, Paul Crowley
• Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Mike Amling
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Mike Amling
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Paul Crowley
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Mike Amling
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Mike Amling
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Peter Pearson
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
      • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
    • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Terry Ritter
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Eather
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Peter Pearson
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Does this have a flaw in de-biasing an entropy stream?, David Wagner
• Certicom and the ECC patents, Max
  • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
    • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, Max
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, Max
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, stan
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, Max
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
      • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, stan
  • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
  • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
  • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
  • Re: Certicom and the ECC patents, tomstdenis
• Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Mike Amling
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Mike Amling
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Make one symmetric key of two symetric keys, Ulf Reiman
• How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?, bobic
  • Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?, Sebastian Gottschalk
  • Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?, bobic
  • Re: How to construct a Public Key Encryption (PKE)?, Sebastian Gottschalk
• Help with Double Playfair cipher, moofy
  • Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher, David Eather
  • Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher, David Eather
  • Re: Help with Double Playfair cipher, moofy
• Encryption standards with no patents?, bsdmike
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
    • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, Markus Jansson
      • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
      • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, bsdmike
      • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
    • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, Markus Jansson
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, bsdmike
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, bsdmike
  • Re: Encryption standards with no patents?, tomstdenis
• Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Frank Corr
  • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Tuna Fish
      • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Tuna Fish
      • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Tuna Fish
      • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Tuna Fish
  • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Frank Corr
  • Re: Encoding Kryptos Part 3 with Two Grids, Douglas A. Gwyn
• What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?, talthen.z-serwera.o2
  • Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?, Paul Rubin
    • Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?, talthen.z-serwera.o2
    • Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?, talthen.z-serwera.o2
  • Re: What ciphering algorith ends with - sign?, talthen.z-serwera.o2
• key container name, jay25dec@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: key container name, tlviewer
  • Re: key container name, me
  • Re: key container name, tlviewer
• brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Unruh
      • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: brute-force estimation, Paul Rubin
      • Re: brute-force estimation, Paul Rubin
      • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
      • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Unruh
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Richard Revis
    • Re: brute-force estimation, tomstdenis
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Paul Rubin
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Unruh
    • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, tomstdenis
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Unruh
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Richard Revis
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Elenhil
  • Re: brute-force estimation, Paul Rubin
• donprng, a PRNG waiting for a distinguishing attack, Francois Grieu
  • Re: donprng, a PRNG waiting for a distinguishing attack, Francois Grieu
• JSH: Not typical people, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Not typical people, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Not typical people, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Not typical people, we_pretty
  • Re: Not typical people, odin
  • Re: JSH: Not typical people, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Not typical people, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Not typical people, David Eather
      • Re: JSH: Not typical people, David Eather
    • Re: JSH: Not typical people, Tim Peters
  • Re: Not typical people, Supermensch von Usenet
  • Re: Not typical people, odin
  • Re: JSH: Not typical people, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Not typical people, we_pretty
• The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', invitro81
  • Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', David Wagner
    • Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', invitro81
  • Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', invitro81
  • Re: The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', David Wagner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Logic behind 'Distinguishers', invitro81
• Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Ugos <\"ugos\"@
  • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Ugos <\"ugos\"@
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Ugos <\"ugos\"@
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Ugos <\"ugos\"@
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, me
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, me
      • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Ugos <\"ugos\"@
    • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, me
  • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Encrypted and signed SMS using ECC, me
• CRL vs OCSP with a smartcard, MajorSoul
  • Re: CRL vs OCSP with a smartcard, MajorSoul
• Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
    • Re: Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
      • Re: Montgomery reduction, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
      • Re: Montgomery reduction, Mike Amling
      • Re: Montgomery reduction, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Montgomery reduction, Mike Amling
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
    • Re: Montgomery reduction, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
    • Re: Montgomery reduction, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, yawnmoth
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Montgomery reduction, tomstdenis
• How to start Cryptography, clicktoshoaib@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, bert
    • Re: How to start Cryptography, VPE
      • Re: How to start Cryptography, hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to start Cryptography, Felix Kronlage
      • Re: How to start Cryptography, Felix Kronlage
      • Re: How to start Cryptography, hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: How to start Cryptography, VPE
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, Tuna Fish
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, Simon Johnson
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, me
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, me
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, me
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, Simon Johnson
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, Tuna Fish
  • Re: How to start Cryptography, bert
• libtom source code, Colin Percival
  • Re: libtom source code, Colin Percival
    • Re: libtom source code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtom source code, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: libtom source code, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtom source code, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: libtom source code, Felix Kronlage
      • Re: libtom source code, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtom source code, Felix Kronlage
      • Re: libtom source code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtom source code, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtom source code, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: libtom source code, Luc The ***e
      • Re: libtom source code, Grumble
      • Re: libtom source code, Luc The ***e
      • Re: libtom source code, Grumble
      • Re: libtom source code, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: libtom source code, vedaal
      • Re: libtom source code, Felix Kronlage
      • Re: libtom source code, vedaal
      • Re: libtom source code, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtom source code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtom source code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtom source code, Felix Kronlage
    • Re: libtom source code, tomstdenis
  • Re: libtom source code, Colin Percival
  • Re: libtom source code, Colin Percival
• Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
  • Re: Real random numbers, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
      • Re: Real random numbers, Grumble
      • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
      • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
      • Re: Real random numbers, Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Real random numbers, Peter Pearson
    • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
      • Re: Real random numbers, Luc The ***e
      • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
      • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
    • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Matt Mahoney
      • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Real random numbers, Matt Mahoney
      • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
      • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
      • Re: Real random numbers, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Real random numbers, Luc The ***e
    • Re: Real random numbers, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
    • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
  • Re: Real random numbers, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Real random numbers, larryhammick
    • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
    • Message not available
      • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Real random numbers, Luc The ***e
    • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
  • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Real random numbers, Tuna Fish
  • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real random numbers, Grumble
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real random numbers, Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Real random numbers, Tuna Fish
  • Re: Real random numbers, larryhammick
  • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Real random numbers, Peter Pearson
  • Re: Real random numbers, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
  • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
  • Re: Real random numbers, Matt Mahoney
  • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
  • Re: Real random numbers, Martin Mayer
  • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
  • Re: Real random numbers, Matt Mahoney
  • Re: Real random numbers, Unruh
  • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Real random numbers, Douglas A. Gwyn
• Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
      • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
    • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
      • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
  • Re: Attack on Discrete Logrithm, bobic
• Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography, Timoleon
  • Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography, Unruh
    • Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography, Timoleon
      • Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography, Timoleon
  • Re: Say Goodbye to Quantum Cryptography, Timoleon
• 3DES vhdl source code, chailin
• AES, Martin Mayer
  • Re: AES, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: AES, Martin Mayer
      • Re: AES, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: AES, Martin Mayer
      • Re: AES, noahs-ark
      • Re: AES, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: AES, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: AES, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: AES, Volker Hetzer
      • Re: AES, Gregory G Rose
      • lots of stiff boats spin Sarah, and they amazingly impress Valerie too, Gregory G Rose
    • if the dry servants can overcome whereby, the spotty edge may heat more coasts, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • my federal firm won't weigh before I rise it, noahs-ark
    • her misery was small, advisory, and spins in touch with the council, Volker Hetzer
    • while delegations swiftly edit drapers, the wastes often catch relative to the british halts, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • it can save once, purchase a great deal, then display for the fitness over the lecture, Joseph Ashwood
    • it climbed, you evoked, yet Doris never irritably waved in view of the range, Andrew Swallow
  • russell, have a relevant month. You won't born it, Martin Mayer
  • we strike the past lad, Martin Mayer
  • it should tuck tensely if Christopher's respect isn't principal, Martin Mayer
• ecc implementation, vikas
  • Re: ecc implementation, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: ecc implementation, Peter Pearson
  • Re: ecc implementation, Mike Amling
• Do you know about ANKIT FADIA ?, yadab
  • Re: Do you know about ANKIT FADIA ?, yadab
• Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Volker Hetzer
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., David Wagner
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., David Wagner
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Volker Hetzer
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., David Wagner
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
      • Re: Online poker and RNG..., David Wagner
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Volker Hetzer
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Brian McKeever
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Volker Hetzer
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Grumble
    • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Gerry
  • Re: Online poker and RNG..., Grumble
• libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Bruce Stephens
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, tomstdenis
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, just . another . lurker
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Peter Pearson
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Luc The ***e
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Timoleon
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Zeljko Vrba
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Peter Pearson
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Zeljko Vrba
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Luc The ***e
      • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Timoleon
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, stan
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, tomstdenis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, tomstdenis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Sebastian Gottschalk
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: libtomcrypt.org dns hijack, stan
• Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?, nhoggard
  • Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?, Watson Ladd
    • Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?, John Bailey
  • Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?, nhoggard
  • Re: Laszlo Kish - totally secure communication using classical physics?, Watson Ladd
• Challenge/response with MD5, ramesh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Challenge/response with MD5, ramesh
• anyone have simple 3des c source code?, chailin
  • Re: anyone have simple 3des c source code?, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Test vector tables for 3DES, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Easy cryptanalysis challenge: QUISCI, Paul Crowley
• secure comparision protocol, roy
  • Re: secure comparision protocol, Luc The ***e
  • Re: secure comparision protocol, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: secure comparision protocol, Joseph Ashwood
• How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?, yuan . mei
  • Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?, Unruh
  • Re: How to decrypt when the key is forgotten?, Unruh
• Chemistry in Cryptography, Lemonyt
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Luc The ***e
    • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Juergen Nieveler
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Doug
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Timoleon
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, apacur
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Lemonyt
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Daniel James
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Lemonyt
  • Re: Chemistry in Cryptography, Timoleon
• quantum computing, yetenator
  • Re: quantum computing, ouah
    • Re: quantum computing, yetenator
      • Re: quantum computing, Unruh
      • Re: quantum computing, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: quantum computing, Unruh
      • Re: quantum computing, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: quantum computing, JiXian Yang
  • Re: quantum computing, Tuna Fish
    • Re: quantum computing, Luc The ***e
      • Re: quantum computing, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: quantum computing, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: quantum computing, Unruh
      • Re: quantum computing, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: quantum computing, Unruh
      • Re: quantum computing, Unruh
    • Re: quantum computing, Luc The ***e
    • Re: quantum computing, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: quantum computing, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: quantum computing, yetenator
• c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?, tfoxusenet
  • Re: c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?, Mike Amling
  • Re: c#/.net framework AND Unix encryption code?, tfoxusenet
• Hardware implementation, Stian Karlsen
  • Re: Hardware implementation, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: Hardware implementation, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Hardware implementation, Stian Karlsen
      • Re: Hardware implementation, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Hardware implementation, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Hardware implementation, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Hardware implementation, Stian Karlsen
  • Re: Hardware implementation, Joseph Ashwood
• Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, Stefan Krah
  • Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, larryhammick
  • Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, Digital Parasite
  • Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, larryhammick
  • Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, Digital Parasite
  • Re: Distributed breaking of Naval Enigma signals, Stefan Krah
• real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site, vedaal
  • Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: real life cryptogram // Bruce schneier's blog site, vedaal
• On WEP, Steven Jones
  • Re: On WEP, Grumble
    • Re: On WEP, Luc The ***e
    • Re: On WEP, Luc The ***e
  • Re: On WEP, Grumble
• Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE, Martin Döring
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE, Martin Döring
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE, Martin Döring
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE, Martin Döring
  • Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE, Martin Döring
• JSH: I haven't implemented, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: I haven't implemented, Felix Rawlings
  • Re: JSH: I haven't implemented, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: I haven't implemented, odin
  • Re: I haven't implemented, odin
• Army or Air Force?, camelontherun
  • Re: Army or Air Force?, scottsanz
    • Re: Army or Air Force?, camelontherun
      • Re: Army or Air Force?, Richard Herring
    • Re: Army or Air Force?, Richard Herring
  • Re: Army or Air Force?, scottsanz
• how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
    • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
  • Re: how to get the cipher text?, chailin
• Better way to protect resource from users, breakdown_crybaby
  • Re: Better way to protect resource from users, Dave Turner
  • Re: Better way to protect resource from users, Dave Turner
  • Re: Better way to protect resource from users, breakdown_crybaby
• JSH: Super techniques, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Super techniques, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Super techniques, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Super techniques, Neo
    • Re: JSH: Super techniques, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Super techniques, Robart
      • Re: JSH: Super techniques, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Super techniques, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Super techniques, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Super techniques, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Super techniques, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Super techniques, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Super techniques, The Last Danish Pastry
• SF: The real equations, my consternation, jstevh
  • Re: SF: The real equations, my consternation, Robart
  • Re: SF: The real equations, my consternation, Lits O'Hate
• simplified des modes of operation, harshal38@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: simplified des modes of operation, Unruh
  • Re: simplified des modes of operation, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: simplified des modes of operation, me
  • Re: simplified des modes of operation, Joseph Ashwood
• cryptainer, Nick
  • Re: cryptainer, Dave Turner
  • Re: cryptainer, Dave Turner
    • Re: cryptainer, Nick
      • Re: cryptainer, Dave Turner
      • Re: cryptainer, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: cryptainer, Dave Howe
    • Re: cryptainer, Nick
      • Re: cryptainer, Padraig MacIain
      • Re: cryptainer, Nick
  • Re: cryptainer, John Bailey
  • Re: cryptainer, Dave Howe
• JSH: First one works, jstevh
• Latest surrogate factoring, complete, jstevh
  • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, odin
    • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Nudge
    • Re: Latest surrogate factoring, complete, Nudge
• Latest surrogate factoring theory, algorithm, jstevh
• generation of random number, Jochen Steger
  • Re: generation of random number, Tom St Denis
    • Re: generation of random number, Jochen Steger
      • Re: generation of random number, Tom St Denis
      • Re: generation of random number, Jochen Steger
  • Re: generation of random number, David Wagner
  • Re: generation of random number, Tom St Denis
• what encryption looks like this?, tobwen
  • Re: what encryption looks like this?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: what encryption looks like this?, Joan Mercer
• SHARCS 2006, info@xxxxxxxxxx
• [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., gst
  • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Francois Grieu
    • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Will Dickson
      • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Francois Grieu
      • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Will Dickson
  • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Volker Hetzer
    • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Paul Rubin
  • Re: [complete newbie] data (not necessarily encrypted) integrity check..., Volker Hetzer
• x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS, MajorSoul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS, MajorSoul
    • Re: x.509 certificate (preferably self-signed) singed with RSASSA-PSS, MajorSoul
• The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Dave Turner
  • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Luc The ***e
    • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Dave Turner
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Unruh
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Luc The ***e
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Unruh
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, David Wagner
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Unruh
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Mike Amling
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Luc The ***e
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, David Eather
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Rob Warnock
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Paul Leyland
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Paul Leyland
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Paul Leyland
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Luc The ***e
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Luc The ***e
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Mike Amling
    • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Unruh
    • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Unruh
  • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, John Savard
  • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Dave Howe
    • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, David Wagner
  • Re: The strength of "post-encryption encryption"?, WTShaw
• problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Eli Bendersky
  • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Eli Bendersky
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, David Wagner
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Eli Bendersky
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, David Wagner
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, David Wagner
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Dennis Ritchie
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: problem with reference AES implementation (CBC) ?, Dennis Ritchie
• Re: Mersenne numbers as factors, Pubkeybreaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mersenne numbers as factors, vedaal
  • Re: Mersenne numbers as factors, JP LR
  • Re: Mersenne numbers as factors, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: X509 question, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: X509 question, Thomas ***in
    • Re: X509 question, Peter Gutmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: X509 question, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: X509 question, Peter Gutmann
• Re: Mental Abuse, Civitas Fenniae
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: Mental Abuse, George Orwell
  • Re: Mental Abuse, Paul Crowley
    • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
    • Re: Mental Abuse, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Re: Mental Abuse, bar
• HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
  • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
    • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Unruh
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Mike Amling
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Unruh
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Paul Rubin
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
      • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Unruh
    • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, Francois Grieu
  • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
  • Re: HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions, vedaal
• A look at slam winners minus the AO !, Dave Hazelwood
• First use of crypto in copy-protection schemes?, bilgerbrau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • First use of crypto in copy-protection schemes?, bilgerbrau
• keyword Question, Frank
  • Re: keyword Question, Peter Pearson
  • Re: keyword Question, Neo
    • Re: keyword Question, Frank
• verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain., Neo
  • Re: verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: verifiable Secret sharing implementation in the public domain., Neo
• Avoiding extension attack, alexiswarner
  • Re: Avoiding extension attack, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: Avoiding extension attack, alexiswarner
  • Re: Avoiding extension attack, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: Avoiding extension attack, alexiswarner
      • Re: Avoiding extension attack, alexiswarner
      • Re: Avoiding extension attack, Mike Amling
    • Re: Avoiding extension attack, alexiswarner
• Collision resistant encryption scheme, silentser@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
  • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, David Wagner
    • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, David Wagner
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, David Wagner
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Mike Amling
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
  • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Unruh
    • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Unruh
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Mike Amling
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
    • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
      • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Cliff
    • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Sergei
  • Re: Collision resistant encryption scheme, Joseph Ashwood
• RSA 1024 in certificate, MajorSoul
  • Re: RSA 1024 in certificate, Tom St Denis
  • Re: RSA 1024 in certificate, Bryan Olson
    • Re: RSA 1024 in certificate, Bryan Olson
      • Re: RSA 1024 in certificate, Erik Naggum
  • Re: RSA 1024 in certificate, Mike Amling
• Time attack resources ?, rohit
  • Re: Time attack resources ?, Grumble
    • Re: Time attack resources ?, Colin Percival
• "Cryptanalysis" of these X-Trace ?, Francois Grieu
  • Re: "Cryptanalysis" of these X-Trace ?, Esa A E Peuha
• Setting TCP flags on OpenSSL packets, Abhi
• Trucrypt and alternatives ..., Chris Ditze-Stephan
  • Re: Trucrypt and alternatives ..., Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: Trucrypt and alternatives ..., Chris Ditze-Stephan
• ECC implementation on an embedded ARM7 core, tripaz
• Saving a password locally, Pieter
  • Re: Saving a password locally, Will Dickson
    • Re: Saving a password locally, Pieter
  • Re: Saving a password locally, Joseph Ashwood
• Fast Base 64 code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
  • Message not available
    • Re: Fast Base 64 code, George
      • Re: Fast Base 64 code, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: They wimp out?, Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: KAL007 Coldwar Mystery, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: KAL007 Coldwar Mystery, stan
• pdf as steganographic carrier ?, vedaal
  • Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?, Sebastian Gottschalk
    • Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?, vedaal
      • Re: pdf as steganographic carrier ?, Luc The ***e
• Re: DNA used as cipher, Tuna Fish
• Re: Human Computational Abilities, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Tino Schwarze
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Luc The ***e
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, VPE
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, David Eather
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, VPE
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Thrasher Remailer
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Unruh
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Richard D. Latham
      • Re: Human Computational Abilities, tesla
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Human Computational Abilities, Unruh
• The Security Of DSA [FIPS 186], Kasparov
  • Re: The Security Of DSA [FIPS 186], Tom St Denis
• Error messages, biffster
  • Re: Error messages, cypher
  • Re: Error messages, jome
• Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW, JMD
  • Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW, David Wagner
    • Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW, JMD
      • Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW, David Wagner
  • Re: Help me understand Tweakable Block Cipher / LRW, Kristian Gjøsteen
• ciphertext change results.., tesla
  • Re: ciphertext change results.., Peter Pearson
  • Re: ciphertext change results.., ashish . sharma . ait
    • Re: ciphertext change results.., tesla
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., Peter Pearson
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., cryptonom
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., tesla
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., Paul Rubin
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., Paul Rubin
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., tesla
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., Paul Rubin
      • Re: ciphertext change results.., Paul Rubin
• Multiple-precision squaring in assembler, Ray
  • Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler, Ray
      • Re: Multiple-precision squaring in assembler, Tom St Denis
• "New Directions" available, hellman314
  • Re: "New Directions" available, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: "New Directions" available, Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder), Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder), Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder), Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
      • Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder), Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder), Ed Weir \(ComCast\)
• Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}, Sevenhundred Elves
  • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}, cryptonom
    • Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}, Sevenhundred Elves
• discrete logarithm, bobic
  • Re: discrete logarithm, Tom St Denis
    • Re: discrete logarithm, bobic
      • Re: discrete logarithm, Tom St Denis
      • Re: discrete logarithm, bobic
  • Discrete Logarithm and LSB, invitro81
    • Re: Discrete Logarithm and LSB, David Wagner
    • Re: Discrete Logarithm and LSB, David Wagner
  • Discrete Logarithm and LSB, invitro81
• Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?, cryptonom
  • Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?, Juuso Hukkanen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: crypto@S.M.S = cryptonom, Stan, Dutch, Herald, Clark, Fat Nerd etc.?, Crypto@xxxxx
• Re: REPOST: Re: Codebreaking puzzle, Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Problem is "pure math", Robart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Problem is "pure math", Douglas A. Gwyn

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2006-02