REPOST: Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?

On 27 Jan 2006 11:07:12 -0800, "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

<snip>

Its interesting to see the selective emphasis you use when it suits
your position.

I've seen you rant on about what constitutes an attack, and using that
criteria, if it suited your position, you could go on and on about how
good Dan Bernstein's method was. Particularly if it was you who
invented it. In that case, I'm sure your position would be a bit more
discriminating.

In fact, if that were the case, I'm quite sure that you would have
special words for anyone that said "Well it hasn't been used
successfully against OpenSSL yet".

Practical or not, and I suspect it is a bit more practical than you
give credit for, it is still a brilliant piece of work.

If only you could take credit for it, I'm sure you would agree.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path: ...204.153.245.151.MISMATCH!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!peer01.west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read05.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: stan <stan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Control: cancel <72gpt190107j3e9ta1g8c0kve0fp2no8oe@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Cancel "Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?"
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Message-ID: <27uma545308g3e8ca1a3f0azc3fm0ux1hf@xxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2
Lines: 2
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:47:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.162.170.136
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xxxxxxx
X-Trace: fed1read05 1138562867 70.162.170.136 (Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:27:47 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:27:47 EST
Organization: Cox Communications
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
    ... Its interesting to see the selective emphasis you use when it suits ... I've seen you rant on about what constitutes an attack, ... If only you could take credit for it, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: What MEMORIAL DAY is about... one view
    ... In current times, that translates to defense against a repetition of 9/11, and for 56 months he has succeeded against a well-funded enemy that is eager to die to repeat such a "victory". ... So why not give him credit for something that he has unquestionably, unarguably, measurably, visibly, achieved? ... First, it's true that a lot of good men and women are casualties due to political decisions, but you cannot know what would have happened if Afghanistan and Iraq had not been used to enforce demands made on Islamic leaders in general to remove the infrastructure supporting terror. ... Second, I talk with experts in military and political science every week, and you are the only "expert" who thinks bin Laden would rather fight soldiers in Iraq than attack again in the United States. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: (OT) Deere Harry Reid,
    ... office to attack a private citizen, and then when that backfired you tried ... to take credit for the resulting outcome. ... kindly fuck off and die. ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)
  • Re: Amazon....sheesh
    ... Raise hell!@! ... You'll get a $5 credit... ... > William Innes wrote: ... Amazon received a rant from me. ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: (OT) Deere Harry Reid,
    ... office to attack a private citizen, and then when that backfired you tried ... to take credit for the resulting outcome. ... It was truly a delight watching Rush kick your ass all over E-bay, ... kindly fuck off and die. ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)