sci.crypt

Thread Index

Re: Get Rich
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Get Rich
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Problem is "pure math"
- From: googleuser
Re: Get Rich
- From: David Taylor
x.509 issuer subject - no match exploits
- From: MajorSoul
Re: timestamp based protocol
- From: stan
Re: REPOST: Re: Codebreaking puzzle
- From: David Taylor
Re: REPOST: Re: OpenSSL receives FIPS 140-2 certification
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: REPOST: Generic code breaking
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: REPOST: Re: Codebreaking puzzle
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Get Rich
- From: David Taylor
Re: timestamp based protocol
- From: cicap
Re: timestamp based protocol
- From: stan
timestamp based protocol
- From: cicap
Re: Get Rich
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Problem is "pure math"
- From: Anon E. Maus
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Francois Grieu
Problem is "pure math"
- From: jstevh
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: REPOST: Osama and the J. Edgar Hoover Memorial Vacuum Cleaner
- From: christo
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Grumble
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Proof doesn't work, examples don't work
- From: Volker Hetzer
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom
Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: BRG
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: samvaknin
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: rohit
Re: Enig4
- From: crypticator
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: Enig4
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Luc The Perverse
REPOST: Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: Tom St Denis
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
REPOST: Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Luc The Perverse
REPOST: Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: John Savard
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: John Savard
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Unruh
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Unruh
REPOST: Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: BRG
Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: BRG
REPOST: Enig4
- From: crypticator
Enig4
- From: crypticator
REPOST: Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: Tom St Denis
REPOST: Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: BRG
Re: Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: BRG
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
REPOST: Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: stan
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: stan
REPOST: Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: JP LR
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: JP LR
REPOST: Re: 3-DES
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: 3-DES
- From: Joseph Ashwood
REPOST: Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
REPOST: Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
REPOST: Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
3-DES
- From: M5vip
Re: 3-DES
- From: stan
REPOST: Re: 3-DES
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: 3-DES
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: 3-DES
- From: stan
Idle curiosity (ieee bitorder)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Carlos Moreno
REPOST: Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Mike Amling
REPOST: Re: X509 question
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: X509 question
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: *** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Are Our Political Leaders Really as Mad as We Suspect? Read Here!
- From: ragnell
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: 3-DES
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
3-DES
- From: M5vip
hi
- From: nk
Re: X509 question
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: X509 question
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul@xxxxxxxxx
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: X509 question
- From: Thomas Pornin
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: karl malbrain
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Gregory G Rose
Re: X509 question
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Gregory G Rose
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
*** surviving my new CANCEL attack***
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: stan
Re: X509 question
- From: Thomas Pornin
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: stan
Re: Decode
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: X509 question
- From: MajorSoul
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: Phil Carmody
Decode
- From: Enigma
Proof doesn't work, examples don't work
- From: jstevh
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: ink
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Q: How to test new hash algorithm?
- From: Martin Hvidberg
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
An hash-Encryption algorithm
- From: Neo
Re: X509 question
- From: Thomas Pornin
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: BRG
X509 question
- From: MajorSoul
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: rohit
Re: Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Paul Rubin
Cache Timing attacks on AES : Replication or further Development?
- From: rohit
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Shane
Osama and the J. Edgar Hoover Memorial Vacuum Cleaner
- From: ragnell
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Paul Rubin
Call for Papers: Special Issue on Security Certification
- From: imecs_2006
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Shane
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Sevenhundred Elves
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: laughing
Re: miller rabin test
- From: Unruh
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Sevenhundred Elves
Re: miller rabin test
- From: Mike Amling
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: miller rabin test
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: laughing
Re: miller rabin test
- From: cicap
Re: miller rabin test
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
miller rabin test
- From: cicap
Re: Hash only (Pepper) data transmission
- From: Lars Schoening
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: laughing
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: laughing
Codebreaking puzzle
- From: Enigma
Cryptanalysis
- From: Fawle R
Re: codebreaking puzzle
- From: Enigma
codebreaking puzzle
- From: Fawle R
Generic code breaking
- From: enigma
Cryptanalysis
- From: chaoticseth
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Anon E. Maus
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Anon E. Maus
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Anon E. Maus
Re: OpenSSL receives FIPS 140-2 certification
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: doubts about signature
- From: David Wagner
Re: doubts about signature
- From: cicap
OpenSSL receives FIPS 140-2 certification
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Peter Pearson
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: doubts about signature
- From: David Wagner
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Stefan Krah
Hash only (Pepper) data transmission
- From: Lars Schoening
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Shane
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Gregory G Rose
doubts about signature
- From: cicap
ANNOUNCE: L14 -> L15
- From: robin_carey5
Re: Sources to decript wanted
- From: scottsanz
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Steven Jones
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Peter Pearson
Re: the merits of NTRU
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Number of iterations in PKCS#5
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: Tino Schwarze
Number of iterations in PKCS#5
- From: Jostein Tveit
Public Key Encryption: The Weakest Link
- From: TwistyCreek
Sources to decript wanted
- From: Alex
Re: *** Surviving this new CANCEL attack ***
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Chris Card
*** Surviving this new CANCEL attack ***
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: the merits of NTRU
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Proof, demonstration useless, what?
- From: jstevh
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Shane
Re: Need help decipher....
- From: Peter Pearson
Need help decipher....
- From: Shane
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: Gregory G Rose
Re: Simple Python elliptic curves and ECDSA
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Tom St Denis
Virtual Copy of Printed Document
- From: frequencieme
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: Tim Peters
Simple Python elliptic curves and ECDSA
- From: Peter Pearson
Re: Using Gimp For Key Material
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: none
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
the merits of NTRU
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: tjwolf
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: Bruce Stephens
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: jstevh
Re: More perspective, factoring
- From: Ben Livengood
More perspective, factoring
- From: jstevh
What will happen
- From: jstevh
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: Tino Schwarze
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: explanation of unilateral authentication nonce based protocol
- From: David Wagner
explanation of unilateral authentication nonce based protocol
- From: cicap
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: Tino Schwarze
Re: Using Gimp For Key Material
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Using Gimp For Key Material
- From: TomFoolery
Re: Using Gimp For Key Material
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Using Gimp For Key Material
- From: TomFoolery
Re: So why lie?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
So why lie?
- From: jstevh
Re: break it - protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: 000
Re: break it - protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: 000
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: implementing sha1
- From: ness
Re: implementing sha1
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: break it - protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: implementing sha1
- From: ness
Re: implementing sha1
- From: ness
Re: implementing sha1
- From: Will Dickson
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Terry Ritter
break it - protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: 000
protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: 000
protect confidentiality and integrity with symmetric key
- From: 000
implementing sha1
- From: ness
Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught
- From: Proginoskes
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught
- From: Unruh
Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught
- From: Bruce Stephens
Re: Comparison
- From: fatal.serpent
Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught
- From: David Eather
Re: How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?
- From: NS
Re: simple protocol (execrise)
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: simple protocol (execrise)
- From: NS
Re: I need some help.
- From: Abraham Wolk
Re: Comparison
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Comparison
- From: datacrush
New attacks on Bluetooth encryption - please clarify
- From: Markus Jansson
How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?
- From: rickyzhang
Re: simple protocol (execrise)
- From: cicap
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Will Dickson
Re: simple protocol (execrise)
- From: NS
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: tjwolf
Re: Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: Paul Rubin
Encryption used in Oxford English Dictionary
- From: tjwolf
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Taylor
Re: Virus spammers getting bolder...
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
Re: What field to study
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: simple protocol (execrise)
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
simple protocol (execrise)
- From: cicap
Re: Files Unreadable (.doc, .url, .mht)
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Files Unreadable (.doc, .url, .mht)
- From: ftrye38
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Virus spammers getting bolder...
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: OT: Virus spammers getting bolder...
- From: Paul Rubin
OT: Virus spammers getting bolder...
- From: John Savard
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: David Wagner
What field to study
- From: wschlanger
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Colin Percival
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Unruh
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: easy stealth encryption?
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Unruh
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: nemo_outis
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
Re: [OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Paul Rubin
[OT] Point of wiping in-memory keys?
- From: Will Dickson
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Gordon Burditt
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Mike Nelson
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Mike Amling
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: fermisoft
Re: Chosen attacks
- From: Unruh
Chosen attacks
- From: fermisoft
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Wang
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Wang
Pre-call for submissions for IEEE Std 1363-2000 revision
- From: William Whyte
Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
- From: daniel bleichenbacher
Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
- From: daniel bleichenbacher
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Unruh
Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
- From: Mike Amling
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Paul Leyland
Open positions at Concordia University, Canada
- From: youssef
Tenure-track faculty positions
- From: youssef
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Bill Unruh
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: David Eather
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Wang
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: John Savard
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: s_4
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: s_4
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Andrew Swallow
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Unruh
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Mike Scott
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Andrew Swallow
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: s_4
Re: Electronic Codebook
- From: Paul Rubin
Electronic Codebook
- From: s_4
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Mack
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Mack
AES4_UICE_slides.pdf
- From: Jean Easter
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: sillybanter
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Bob
FlexiProvider: an open source cryptography provider for the JCA/JCE
- From: Martin Döring
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: chaeso
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Unruh
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Paul Leyland
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Andrew Swallow
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Mxsmanic
US nu-cu-lear bases.. access is kids stuff :-)
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: chaeso
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: chaeso
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: chaeso
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: Pubkeybreaker
multi-key encryption algorithm is meaningful?
- From: chaeso
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Unruh
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: John Savard
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Erik Naggum
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Unruh
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: John Savard
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Why should the primes p and q be safe primes?
- From: Colin Percival
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
OEF for DH?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Why should the primes p and q be safe primes?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: David Eather
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Bryan Olson
Why should the primes p and q be safe primes?
- From: bobic
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: fbloveu
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: fbloveu
Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem
- From: fbloveu
Re: RSA key length and more
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
RSA key length and more
- From: Pesso
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Erik Naggum
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Erik Naggum
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: laughing
Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06)
- From: Colin Percival
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Wang
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Eduardo Ruiz
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Eduardo Ruiz
Re: some question about RSA
- From: Tom St Denis
some question about RSA
- From: Wang
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: johnicholas . hines
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: Unruh
Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem
- From: Unruh
Re: A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: fbloveu
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: fbloveu
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: David Wagner
Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem
- From: fbloveu
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06)
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
A New Encryption Algorithm
- From: healyd
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06)
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem
- From: Unruh
Re: Call for Papers: SAM'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Peter Pearson
Re: [NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
[NEWBIE]vigenere
- From: cicap
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Shai Halevi
Re: Is it a hard problem?
- From: Tom St Denis
Is it a hard problem?
- From: fbloveu
Questoin about the security of Discrete Log Problem
- From: fbloveu
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Chris Card
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Ichinin
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: David Eather
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: kurt wismer
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: Bob
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA(Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: David Eather
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: Paul Leyland
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
RSA Security Group - Feel Free to Join -
- From: Information Security
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Erik Naggum
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Ichinin
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Hieu
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Berryo
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: laicko
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: The Flavored Coffee Guy
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: elgersmad
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: ink
project - signing (and verifying) a message (text) using DSA (Visual Basic.NET implementation, or VB)
- From: Kasparov
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: laicko
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: christo
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: BRG
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: daniel bleichenbacher
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: David Wagner
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: ink
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: BRG
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: David Eather
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: BRG
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: A. Caspis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: blind signature is not blind enough?
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: laicko
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: Doug
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: wbhart
Re: How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl
- From: Berlid
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Hieu
Re: HMAC vs Salt
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: wbhart
HMAC vs Salt
- From: Hieu
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: David Wagner
Re: DNA used as cipher
- From: wbhart
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: BRG
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Gabriel Lear
DNA used as cipher
- From: christo
Re: blind signature is not blind enough?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Bill Unruh
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: rsa key generation question
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Mike Amling
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Gregory G Rose
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: blind signature is not blind enough?
- From: Jeff
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: wbhart
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Terry Ritter
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: Chris Card
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: wbhart
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Richard Herring
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: David Wagner
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Nemok
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: Mike Scott
Re: efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: Tom St Denis
efficiency question about modular exponention operation
- From: laicko
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: rsa key generation question
- From: kaskati2003
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Richard Herring
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Richard Herring
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: Chris Card
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Chris Card
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Colin Percival
How to represent a message as a point M in ECC with Miracl
- From: jean_lee1998id
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: David Eather
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Mxsmanic
RSA encrypt/decrypt in C++ (with OpenSSL)
- From: Carlos Moreno
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Gregory G Rose
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Michael Harrington
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: wbhart
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: stan
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: wbhart
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Mike Amling
Re: msieve is FAST!!
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
msieve is FAST!!
- From: wbhart
Re: porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
porting GnuPG to PPC {Re: Computing big numbers}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: John E. Hadstate
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Mike Amling
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom@xxxxxxx
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: stan
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: stan
Re: How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Mike Amling
Re: rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Can you crack this
- From: Mike Amling
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
self-appointed expert? {Re: RS-232 random number generator}
- From: cryptonom
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: cryptonom
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Mxsmanic
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: EU decides to keep all connectio ndata for 6 month to 2 years, how to circumvent / elude ?
- From: Richard Herring
Re: How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function?
- From: Peter Pearson
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Tom St Denis
How to construct one-way permutation from one-way function?
- From: dan
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Pubkeybreaker
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Chris Card
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: Michael Harrington
Re: Computing big numbers
- From: ink
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: Can you crack this
- From: teslacoils2006
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: David A Molnar
Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: MrFix3
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Terry Ritter
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Computing big numbers
- From: toorandom@xxxxxxxxx
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: wbhart
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: JP LR
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Unruh
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: snaga
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
rosary-based low-tech crypto?
- From: johnicholas . hines
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: David A Molnar
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Tuna Fish
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Mike Amling
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Mike Amling
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Bryan Olson
Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: Carlos Moreno
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm
- From: Tino Schwarze
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Nemok
Re: A factoring algorithm
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
Re: Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: David A Molnar
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Paul Rubin
A factoring algorithm
- From: hart_wb
Re: SIGS How to get the sieving polynoms
- From: hart_wb
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Recommentations for research topic and mentor
- From: truevalue
Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: SHA Question
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Double-applied symmetric algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: David Wagner
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Andrew Swallow
Double-applied symmetric algorithm
- From: David F
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Nemok
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Unruh
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Jameson King
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Nemok
Re: Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk
Help needed with encryption algorithm
- From: Nemok
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Tomasz Leskier
Biotechnology********Intellectual Property Rights
- From: contactme4u
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: stan
Re: SHA Question
- From: Neo
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Unruh
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Tomasz Leskier
Re: OEF curve
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Will Dickson
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Mike Amling
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: OEF curve
- From: Darrel Hankerson
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Java iButton discontinued
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: OEF curve
- From: WiteG
Re: project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: WiteG
project - signing (and verifying) a message using XTR algorithm (java implementation)
- From: Tomasz Leskier
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Vernon Schryver
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Jan Panteltje
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Doug
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Douglas A. Gwyn
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Mike Amling
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: David Wagner
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: snaga
Re: RS-232 random number generator
- From: Paul Rubin
RS-232 random number generator
- From: David Eather
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: vedaal
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Doug
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
enigmail, evolution with signature and encryption
- From: Peter Schwabe
Re: Can you crack this
- From: John E. Hadstate
PKI question, trusting subordinate CA
- From: hagaiy
Re: Can you crack this
- From: Luc The Perverse
Re: Can you crack this
- From: Siddharam Shingshetty
Re: sending hidden messages
- From: Twittering One
Re: Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography"
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Unruh
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: David Wagner
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: On IVs
- From: Ivan Voras
how to manage certificate store
- From: jay25dec@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography"
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography"
- From: Tom St Denis
Typo in "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography"
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: On IVs
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: On IVs
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: On IVs
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: stan
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: David Eather
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: OEF curve
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: AES operation order
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: Francois Grieu
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: snaga
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: cryptonom
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: David Eather
Re: On IVs
- From: David Wagner
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: SHA Question
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: On IVs
- From: Tom St Denis
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
On IVs
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Unruh
Re: OT: Why include this in your reply?
- From: stan
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: snaga
Re: sending hidden messages
- From: Peter Fairbrother
sending hidden messages
- From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
Re: DES doubts. why we use 56 bit key when ony 48 bits are used?
- From: vedaal
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Peter Fairbrother
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Non-computer randomization
- From: Paul Rubin
Non-computer randomization
- From: snaga
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: SHA Question
- From: Ichinin
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Paul Rubin
Re: Basic tools of encryption: Transposition and substitution?
- From: Doug
Re: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Gabriel Lear
Re: Password length and bit number of encryption algorithm?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
Re: Why include this in your reply?
- From: Joseph Ashwood