Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: "laicko" <yichun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Dec 2005 01:27:27 -0800
>Actually, that's not quite what I meant. Let me restate what I was trying
>to say. Suppose we have a magic algorithm A such that A(P,abP,aP) = bP.
>Then it follows that A(aP,bP,P) = abP (do you see why?), so it follows that
>algorithm A can be used to solve the CDH problem. Corollary: Solving your
>problem is at least as hard as solving the CDH problem.
I know how it deduce. if A(P,abP,aP) = bP, then A(aP, ba^{-1}aP,
a^{-1}aP)=abP while a^{-1} = a^{phi(o(P))-1} (mod o(P)) .
my problem is at least as hard as CDH
and if CDH can be solved by algorithm B such that B(P,aP,bP) =abP,
then we could use it to compute B(aP, baP,a^{-1}aP) =ba^{-1}aP=bP,
CDH is at least as hard as my problem.
is that right?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- References:
- Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: laicko
- Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: laicko
- Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- From: David Wagner
- Is it a hard problem to solve
- Prev by Date: Re: SHA Question
- Next by Date: Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- Next by thread: Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|