Re: SHA Question
- From: "Ichinin" <gurgel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Dec 2005 18:51:50 -0800
Tom wrote:
> PKCS #5 addresses this in a more flexible manner.
Got a pointer to that? (link + section) i'm curious what is says..
> They're not salt bytes if they're static. That actually doesn't make
it any harder for the attacker.
What to call it then? "pre-/appended junkbytes that go in with the
passphrase"?
The question Neo was asking about was to "encrypt files", so sessionkey
creation / management is not very useful, thats why i ommited them
earlier.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SHA Question
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: SHA Question
- From: Mika Bostrom
- Re: SHA Question
- References:
- SHA Question
- From: Neo
- Re: SHA Question
- From: Ichinin
- Re: SHA Question
- From: tomstdenis
- SHA Question
- Prev by Date: Re: SHA Question
- Next by Date: Re: Is it a hard problem to solve
- Previous by thread: Re: SHA Question
- Next by thread: Re: SHA Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|