Re: double-DES
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Dec 2005 13:29:21 -0800
"Larry" <larry_grant_dc@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > No, it's no more secure.
> OK... I wish I could remember where I saw that. It should be corrected.
What you probably saw is that 2DES isn't as big an improvement over
1DES as one might think. That's why 3DES is preferred.
.
- References:
- double-DES
- From: Larry
- Re: double-DES
- From: tomstdenis
- Re: double-DES
- From: Larry
- double-DES
- Prev by Date: Re: What's wrong with this RC4?
- Next by Date: Naval Enigma 4-rotor [en|de]cipherment example
- Previous by thread: Re: double-DES
- Next by thread: Re: double-DES
- Index(es):
