Re: MC2

Don't get angry :) I just said it's nothing special. I only used
instead of multiplication in GF(2^m) that in GF(p) fields. Diffusion is
not that bad. I tested it's performance as a cryptographic pseudorandom
number generator (100x1Mb generated pseudorandom binary strings), and
it scored very good in comparison with todays ciphers (FIPS and NIST
tests).
Contra-question: Why couldn't I use bunch of GF(p) fields instead of
one GF(2^m)?

.