Re: Life can have positive value
From: Dutch (no_at_email.com)
Date: 10/31/05
- Next message: Twittering One: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Previous message: dh_at_.: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- In reply to: dh_at_.: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Next in thread: Twittering One: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:30:22 -0800
<dh@.> wrote
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:53:09 -0700, "Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><dh@.> wrote
>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:17:33 GMT, tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>"We does for the Lord when we does for his critturs," said Tom.
>>>
>>> Dutch doesn't agree of course.
>
> I was of the impression that you don't believe there is a Lord. If you
> do, do you believe there's any possibility of an afterlife? If so, which
> animals do you think might be able to have one?
All irrelevant.
>>Yes I do. Animal welfare is an honorable calliing is what that means. It
>>doesn't mean that we ought to go out of our way to breed more domestic
>>animals.
Direct answer igonored...
>> > The real question is:
>>
>>Why does fuckwit believe that we do animals a disservice by not causing
>>them
>>to be born?
>
> I don't.
Then how can you criticize veganism for supposedly not causing animals to be
born?
[..]
- Next message: Twittering One: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Previous message: dh_at_.: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- In reply to: dh_at_.: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Next in thread: Twittering One: "Re: Life can have positive value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]