Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry
From: Douglas Eagleson (eaglesondouglas_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/30/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Oct 2005 14:13:55 -0800
That style of writing stinks.
All that word addition method is stupid. Explicit bit
array state is preferred.
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Engine Kernal for Generic Cracking- my entry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|