Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 10/28/05
- Next message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: possibly snakeoil ?"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Next in thread: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "REPOST: Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "REPOST: Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Oct 2005 07:04:22 -0700
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> Tom, you seem a bit rusty on FPGA size...
> Even for a modest Spartan equivalent of 1 600 000 gates is in the shops:
> http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon_solutions/fpgas/product_tables.htm#Spartan3E
>
One low cost development tactic is to bundle an FPGA with an embedded
processor. Now do you want to use 1.6M gate parts or the smaller
30K-50K parts?
This is analogous to saying "we can always throw more cycles at it".
Tom
- Next message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: possibly snakeoil ?"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Next in thread: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "REPOST: Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Reply: Jan Panteltje: "REPOST: Re: High Bandwidth Mixing Cipher Chips"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|