Re: SCI.CRYPT is turning into CRAP
From: Francois Grieu (fgrieu_at_francenet.fr)
Date: 10/27/05
- Next message: mark r.: "Re: secure accumulator?"
- Previous message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: secure accumulator?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCI.CRYPT is turning into CRAP"
- Next in thread: Esa A E Peuha: "Re: SCI.CRYPT is turning into CRAP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:34:44 +0200
tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> Cuz it's impossible to forge a header right?
Many headers of nntp messages are added by the
server, not by the client, making them relatively
hard to forge; very much harder that the "from" field
of an email, at least.
I do bet that while Mouse was sending the message
at the head of the present thread, a computer accessing
the net thru the same connection (possibly but
not necessarily the same computer; they could be distinct
machines on the same NAT router) was spitting cancels.
See <fgrieu-639696.17192427102005@news16-e.proxad.net>
Francois Grieu
- Next message: mark r.: "Re: secure accumulator?"
- Previous message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: secure accumulator?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCI.CRYPT is turning into CRAP"
- Next in thread: Esa A E Peuha: "Re: SCI.CRYPT is turning into CRAP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|