REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys

parwal.sandeep_at_gmail.com
Date: 10/24/05 

Date: 24 Oct 2005 00:59:19 -0700

thanks joe for your suggestion ..

but my prob is that i made algo for generating alphanumeric key now..
how i can determine that these keys will be random.
i went thru some texts but those all are on numeric keys.. (book :
"the art of comp. prog.. by knuth)
there is some algo like chi square tests .. it is based on some ranges
in which these no comes..
but waht about aplhanumeric ..

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path: ...newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!in2p3.fr!proxad.net!proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: parwal.sandeep@gmail.com
Control: cancel <1130140759.924863.92400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Cancel "Re: help ragarding licensing keys"
Newsgroups: de.alt.test,sci.crypt
Message-ID: <cancel.1130140759.924863.92400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: CommMaker IE
Lines: 2
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:20:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.186.178
X-Trace: fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1130185248 82.34.186.178 (Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:20:48 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:20:48 BST

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path: ...newsfeed.news2me.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rcn.net!news.rcn.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:25:06 -0500
From: parwal.sandeep@gmail.com
Control: cancel <3$%$$-%%-__$_-%__$$@news.noc.cabal.int>
Subject: Cancel "REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys"
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:15:02 GMT
Message-ID: <8%-%-__$__-$____$-_@news.noc.cabal.int>
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.02.00.01
Lines: 2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.121.22.24
X-Trace: sv3-Zmq2FE+AD+uvwYs388PrI5HiD0SfHk7eG+JLGfDvzNWIIjZJ+2tv29fcJnlGhb1QgG1XoQuvJWvKlZl!q78OaqN5UxQjrrZfPcFM3iXpLtlL6m/1Nh9e2NGwITzfxmHE2YZoEyB6SljDYIfNigSVVkPYUQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32

Relevant Pages

  • REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys
    ... > i have an algo to generate a random alphanumeric key .. ... secure license keys (and some very good arguments saying that they do not ... Subject: Cancel "Re: help ragarding licensing keys" ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.121.22.24 ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • REPOST: help ragarding licensing keys
    ... Cancel "help ragarding licensing keys" ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.186.178 ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys
    ... You do NOT check randomness by looking at the output. ... Note that if it were "random" two keys could be the same. ... Subject: Cancel "Re: help ragarding licensing keys" ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.121.22.24 ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys
    ... > but my prob is that i made algo for generating alphanumeric key now.. ... For preventing collisions your keys should have at least 128 bits of information because of the birthday-attack, which gives you a probability of 2^for successfully finding a collision. ... Subject: Cancel "Re: help ragarding licensing keys" ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.186.178 ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • REPOST: Re: help ragarding licensing keys
    ... > but my prob is that i made algo for generating alphanumeric key now.. ... For preventing collisions your keys should have at least 128 bits of information because of the birthday-attack, which gives you a probability of 2^for successfully finding a collision. ... Subject: Cancel "Re: help ragarding licensing keys" ... NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.121.22.24 ...
    (sci.crypt)