REPOST: Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress_at_nowhere.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:29:34 GMT
In his second reply to a post of mine, lkcl wrote:
>>Then your data is way-far out from the expected.
> _tell_ me about it!!!!
About 1 in 100 trials should have p <= 0.01, and you are scoring
over 5000 of 204800 at that level. That is over 65 standard
deviations above the mean.
> now demonstrate to me where the flaw is,
> in the source code or in my reasoning.
Been there; done that.
Your code is buggy and unreadable, your graphs are ill-defined
to the point of nonsense, and by your own account, your lack
> this should _not_ be happening.
> it should _not_ be possible in any encryption
> algorithm to simply count the 1s and 0s of
> an encryption output and be able to draw
> conclusions about its input.
Which is probably why you've done no such thing.
-- --Bryan ========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======: Path: ...news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rcn.net!news.rcn.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:15 -0500 From: Bryan Olson <email@example.com> Control: cancel <2S87f.5993$dO2.firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Cancel "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent" Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:02:18 GMT Message-ID: <3K34e.0663-aO3.email@example.com> X-Newsreader: PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2 Lines: 2 NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.127.116.11 X-Trace: sv3-F5zKSweW6F3TMU5cTlP9h0FEPx5YVW+be2/EjT79hIkzqfAYedpUHAUToRrE4qUZz65VfjboqrpzAVK!n3vYKC0+aHlzb5PPnpigZCgkdg4dJafEeGYP4eXh4IhAw5iSXJRfTAAwLweDesVtWqDY3+0PpD7K!mz/R720= X-Complaints-To: firstname.lastname@example.org X-DMCA-Complaints-To: email@example.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32