Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress_at_nowhere.org)
Date: 10/24/05
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- In reply to: lkcl: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "REPOST: Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:29:34 GMT
In his second reply to a post of mine, lkcl wrote:
>>Then your data is way-far out from the expected.
>
> _tell_ me about it!!!!
About 1 in 100 trials should have p <= 0.01, and you are scoring
over 5000 of 204800 at that level. That is over 65 standard
deviations above the mean.
> now demonstrate to me where the flaw is,
> in the source code or in my reasoning.
Been there; done that.
Your code is buggy and unreadable, your graphs are ill-defined
to the point of nonsense, and by your own account, your lack
mathematical rigor.
> this should _not_ be happening.
>
> it should _not_ be possible in any encryption
> algorithm to simply count the 1s and 0s of
> an encryption output and be able to draw
> conclusions about its input.
Which is probably why you've done no such thing.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- In reply to: lkcl: "Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128 and serpent"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "REPOST: Re: advice sought on key/data histogram analysis of rijndael/128"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|