Re: ECC point of inf question
From: Ben Livengood (ben.livengood_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/20/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Previous message: O.L.: "Re: Randomly-generated challenge method ?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "ECC point of inf question"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 20 Oct 2005 11:11:42 -0700
> \infty = (x, y) + (x, -y)
The point at infinity is defined precisely because the slope is
undefined between (x,y) and (x,-y). For points on a curve to be a group
under addition there has to be an element that is the result of such an
addition.
> My take is that if some pair (x, y) do satisfy the above and the > curve is of prime order then the pair is valid for use in ECC
> operations? Is that right?
There are several important checks to make sure a curve and points on
the curve are valid, including the MOV test. The document "Elliptic
Curve Cryptography" from the Standards for Effecient Cryptography Group
(www.secg.org/collateral/sec1.pdf) is a very complete reference, and
section 3.1 describes the validation procedure for curves and base
points.
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Previous message: O.L.: "Re: Randomly-generated challenge method ?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "ECC point of inf question"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: ECC point of inf question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|