Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES
ddyer_at_real-me.net
Date: 10/17/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Cryptoanalysis challenge"
- Previous message: ddyer_at_real-me.net: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 17 Oct 2005 11:00:38 -0700
>Why don't you use a public key for encryption, so no passphrase is
>needed except for decryption.
Not a bad idea, but that would be a different program. This one is
a self contained utility. I don't want to encumber it with
public/private
key generation and storage.
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Cryptoanalysis challenge"
- Previous message: ddyer_at_real-me.net: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]