Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES
ddyer_at_real-me.net
Date: 10/17/05
- Next message: ddyer_at_real-me.net: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Previous message: MB: "Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree"
- In reply to: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Next in thread: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 17 Oct 2005 10:50:06 -0700
I did anticipate that using md5x2 in too simple a way would compromise
the key length. I'm using.
Md5HexString(passphrase,0,digits);
UnHexify(digits,32,dig1,16); // store the actual hash
Md5Digest(digits,0,dig2); // hash the hexified md5
for(i=0;i<16;i++) { *key++ = dig1[i]; *key++=dig2[i]; };
..assuming that the ascii/hex in the second hash would
add unique noise.
- Next message: ddyer_at_real-me.net: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Previous message: MB: "Re: Jacobi symbols of higher degree"
- In reply to: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Next in thread: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: needed: reviewers for an implementaion of AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]