Re: X68-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique

tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 10/07/05


Date: 7 Oct 2005 14:56:35 -0700


Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> Carlos Moreno wrote:
>
> > I mean, would you oppose to hardware-based memory protection?
> > One could claim that "the correct solution" is to never write
> > code that has pointer/memory-related bugs, etc. I get a more
> > peaceful sleep knowing that if I make the mistake, I get a
> > segfault and core dump, instead of overwriting some internal
> > kernel buffers.
>
> What about using a language that doesn't even give you the ability to
> create buffer overflows or mistaken points at all?

Such a language exists?

Tom