Re: SSN encryption
arachnidster_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/30/05
- Next message: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: The effects of quantum computers"
- In reply to: drfremove_at_nber.org: "SSN encryption"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Sep 2005 19:56:42 -0700
Unless I'm missing something fairly major, why not just use an HMAC
instead of all these complicated protocols people have proposed? Unless
they know the key to the HMAC, no number of known plaintext/hash pairs
will allow them to discover others. The HMAC result can be
shortened/formatted as appropriate, though the shorter it is, the
higher the probability of collision.
Alternately, just number sequentially, as someone else suggested.
- Next message: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: The effects of quantum computers"
- In reply to: drfremove_at_nber.org: "SSN encryption"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSN encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]