Re: Salsa20 altivec timings
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- In reply to: xmath: "Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Next in thread: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Reply: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:55:27 -0700
xmath wrote:
> It's interesting to note that, due to unavoidable data-dependencies, a
> Salsa20 round must take at least 12 cycles, as absolute CPU-independent
> minimum (unless it offers combined add-rotate, rotate-xor, or xor-add
> instructions that execute in one cycle, something I've never seen in
> any CPU).
ARM offers add-rotate but not the others [it can xor-rotate but not
rotate-xor].
Still not bad cycle counts. Coo!
Tom
- Next message: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- In reply to: xmath: "Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Next in thread: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Reply: xmath: "Re: Salsa20 altivec timings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|