Re: Google Secure Access
arachnidster_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Previous message: xmath: "Salsa20 altivec timings"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:41:16 -0700
tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> arachnidster@gmail.com wrote:
> > I don't see the problem here, personally. This isn't designed to solve
> > the rogue AP problem, it's designed to solve the "somebody with another
> > wireless card can listen to everything I do" problem.
>
> That's not a real problem though as any half-ass competent shop will
> have their own VPN. And if you can't sort out VPN then an SSH server
> with -D SOCKS is just as easy.
As I was trying to say, any 'half-ass competent shop' won't need this
service. Your semi-tech-literate next-door neighbour that wants to
connect with wifi somewehere will. He doesn't have someone to set up a
VPN for himself, and has nowhere to set up an SSH tunnel to. His
concern is people packetsniffing his email password (for example),
which this solves neatly.
> > I certainly wouldn't trust anything particularaly vital to them, but
> > that's when you start using your own measures, like your own VPN,
> > instead.
>
> If you can't trust your own employees...
Huh?
Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:
> Or is it Google capitalizing on a problem to secure even more of the market
> share? Are you in fact trading the threat of someone eavesdropping on your
> wireless for the certainty that Google will?
>
> Sure you are...
_Perhaps_ Google is datamining all the traffic that goes through this
gateway. Personally, I doubt it, but it's irrelevant anyway: this
service is here for people who are concerned that someone is going to
packet-sniff your email password or other personal information, not
people who are concerned their traffic is being datamined.
I seriously doubt Google cares what my IMAP password is.
nobody@firenze.linux.it wrote:
> You forget google's penchant for archiving absolutely EVERYTHING they can
> get their grubby little paws on.
>
> Google is NOT to be trusted.
I'm not aware of instances of Google archiving anything other than
publicly available information. What use would they have for it anyway?
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Previous message: xmath: "Salsa20 altivec timings"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Google Secure Access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|