How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?
From: pv (usenet-nospam_at_segfault.co.uk)
Date: 09/26/05
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: How To Abandon Microsoft"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: How To Abandon Microsoft"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Unruh: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:53:09 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've just been reading Dan Brown's Digital Fortress and, whilst a lot of
the crypto stuff in it is rather tenuous or incorrect, I got thinking about
the general premise of the story - that the NSA can 'adapt' a secure
algorithm and put a back door in it.
Sure GnuPG is open source and regarded as being pretty secure, but how many
times do people actually examine the source code to it? IF there was a
backdoor in it, how long would it last before someone actually found it?
Paul
- --
__\\|//__
(` o-o ')
- ---- www.segfault.co.uk ------ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------------
Free, anonymous email addresses available!
(email address is genuine, to fool junkmailers)
It is time we turned the tide - David Icke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-sb1 (RISC OS)
iD8DBQFDOFGtxX4NYN/CpBwRAk/ZAKCHnuI/+cR9xtaAOxigSkhO3cjy6wCcD0hC
RpM6z9by8vppGCT3WQDBOqA=
=b80/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: How To Abandon Microsoft"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: How To Abandon Microsoft"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Unruh: "Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|